Developments, news and strategies for drug development specific to phase I through Phase III global clinical trial management, execution, project management and outsourcing. Go→
News, articles and issues specific to clinical trial practice and implementation at the investigative site level. Go→
Strategies and innovations related to how clinical professionals are utilizing technology internal and external to their organizations to advance clinical trials. Go→
News, articles and issues specific to laboratories role in the clinical trial, including ECG, imaging, genotyping, tissue samples and more. Go→
News, developments and strategies for clinical trials conduct in relation to the FDA, EMEA and other global regulatory authorities overseeing the drug development industry. Go→
News, articles and strategies related to clinical trial design which impact postmarketing studies, therapeutic areas, adaptive trials, statistics, protocols and more. Go→
ICON plc (NASDAQ: ICLR), today announced that Aptiv Solutions, an ICON plc company leading the design and implementation of adaptive trials, has released ADDPLAN® DF 3.0, which incorporates complex statistical methodologies to prevent under and over-estimation of a therapeutic’s maximum target dose (MTD) during Phase I dose escalation trials. Accurate estimation of MTD minimises safety and efficacy issues leading to late phase clinical trial failures and is of particular importance for oncology, which has one of the highest Phase III attrition rates among all major therapeutic classes.
“Inaccurate dose selection in Phase I can place a ceiling on drug efficacy in all subsequent phases, potentially dooming a good drug, or expose patients to needlessly high and harmful doses. Operational tools that improve accuracy of Phase I trials is a major objective for drug developers,” says Professor Andy Grieve, Senior Vice President of Clinical Trial Methodology at Aptiv Solutions.
The pharmaceutical industry is well aware that the traditional 3+3 approach, which is still used in more than 95% of Phase I trials, is slow and often underestimates the MTD. Alternative model-based approaches, such as the continual reassessment method (CRM) and the modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI) approach, have broader appeal. Regulatory agencies are supportive of the development of innovative dose escalation procedures. For example, Sue-Jane Wang of the Office of Biostatistics at the FDA co-authored a recent publication in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on the mTPI methodology.
Despite clear advantages, adoption of these model-based approaches has been slow due to the intensive programming required for confident implementation and avoidance of MTD over-estimation. Aptiv Solutions developed ADDPLAN DF 3.0 to provide a validated platform for simulating and comparing dose escalation designs without the need for intensive programming. The software, which benefited from beta testing feedback from ADDPLAN DF Consortium members at Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis, simulates and allows comparison of the 3+3, mTPI, classical CRM, and a modified CRM approach known as Bayesian logistic regression with overdose control. The latter methodology was originally developed by Novartis.
Executing adaptive designs in Phase I and beyond can require sophisticated logistics and robust firewalls to maintain trial integrity. ADDPLAN DF software provides direct integration with AptivAdvantage®, the leading real-time execution technology platform for seamless implementation of dose adaptations and operational modifications in adaptive design trials.