Between 2004 and 2012, the Number of Endpoints per Protocol has Nearly Doubled - Applied Clinical Trials

ADVERTISEMENT

See our 2012 Buyers Guide Digital Edition.
Find Pharma Search Engine
Between 2004 and 2012, the Number of Endpoints per Protocol has Nearly Doubled

Source: Applied Clinical Trials



The 10-year increase in the number of unique and total procedures per protocol corresponds to an increase in the number of endpoints supported by these procedures. Research conducted by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (Tufts CSDD) finds that between 2004 and 2012, the number of endpoints per protocol has nearly doubled from an average of eight per protocol in the earlier period to 14 endpoints in the later period. Half of all procedures support supplemental secondary, tertiary, and exploratory endpoints—a proportion that has remained constant during this eight-year period. Sponsor companies have added more procedures for a variety of reasons: clinical scientists seek more contextual data to interpret and validate findings and guide development decisions; statisticians wish to collect more data to explain observations and potential new interactions; and sponsor companies also note that procedures supporting tertiary and exploratory endpoints are added in anticipation of perceived or real regulatory agency and payor inquiry, commercialization, and competitive pressures.

—Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, https://csdd.tufts.edu/.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Access Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA | July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA | August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA | August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA | August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

FindPharma
Survey
As it creates a plan to implement the US biosimilar pathway, should FDA:
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
Create entirely its own pathway program?
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
94%
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
0%
Create entirely its own pathway program?
6%
View Results
Untitled Document
Source: Applied Clinical Trials,
Click here