FDA Approves Fewer New Drugs, but Acts Fast on Innovative Products - Applied Clinical Trials

ADVERTISEMENT

See our 2013 Buyers Guide Digital Edition.
FDA Approves Fewer New Drugs, but Acts Fast on Innovative Products

Source: Applied Clinical Trials

As expected, the Food and Drug Administration approved only 27 new molecular entities (NMEs) in 2013. There was no late-December surge in approvals to bring the tally closer to the near-record of 39 innovative new drugs approved in 2012.

In addition, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) approved eight novel products, including innovative influenza vaccines and a number of blood products.

The lower approval total, FDA officials have emphasized in recent weeks, fit the averages of the last ten years and is not a sign of decreased innovation by manufacturers or any slowdown in the agency’s approval process. John Jenkins, director of CDER’s Office of New Drugs, explained at a December meeting that the main reason for the decline in approvals last year is a drop in the number of new drug applications filed with the agency, and not more rejections by FDA. CDER met review time frames for all of the new NMEs, and most of them (89%) were reviewed in the first review cycle.

A report from CDER on the 2013 new drug approvals [available at www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DrugInnovation/default.htm]
emphasizes that one-third of the new NMEs are “first-in-class” medicines, and one-third are treatments for rare or orphan diseases. The list includes the first three breakthrough drugs approved by the agency. These and a substantial number of the new approvals benefited from expedited approval under the fast track, priority review, accelerated approval, as well as breakthrough designations – in a number of cases applications were eligible for more than one expedited approval method. FDA also is proud of the fact that nearly three-quarters of the new drugs were approved first in the U.S., compared with foreign countries.

FDA describes its 2013 approval performance as a return to “normal” and not a sign of problems. And it highlights that all its strategies to approve innovative drugs more efficiently help speed patient access to important new medicines. Yet, the lower number of important new therapies coming to market highlights the challenge for FDA and biopharma companies to devise new methods for improving the success rate in drug development programs to yield more applications ready for FDA review and approval.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

UPCOMING CONFERENCES

8th Annual Forum on Transparency and Aggregate Spend 2014
Washington, DC
August 18-20, 2014

eSource Data in Clinical Investigations
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2014

Pharmacovigilance 2014
Philadelphia, PA
September 10-11, 2014

Collaborative Research Summit
Philadelphia, PA
October 15-16, 2014

See All Conferences >>

Survey
As it creates a plan to implement the US biosimilar pathway, should FDA:
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
Create entirely its own pathway program?
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
86%
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
6%
Create entirely its own pathway program?
7%
View Results
Untitled Document
Source: Applied Clinical Trials,
Click here