Moving Toward Personalized Healthcare - Applied Clinical Trials

ADVERTISEMENT

See our 2013 Buyers Guide Digital Edition.
Moving Toward Personalized Healthcare

Source: Applied Clinical Trials

Editor’s Note: This article is part of a series examining popular peer-reviewed articles from years past called “Peer-Reviews Revisited: Why You Should Read Today.” You can read the other articles in this series here.

The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act authorized the creation of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. PCORI underscored existing trends toward increasingly individualized and personalized medical care, and required research protocols to include various subpopulations such as racial and ethnic minorities, women, age, and comorbidities, genetic and molecular subtypes, and quality of life preferences.

“This requirement presents the potential to discover and disseminate crucial comparative effectiveness research findings that individual patients and their clinicians need for making informed health-care decisions,” said Kathleen Wyrwich, PhD, Senior Research Leader at Evidera Outcomes Research Group, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Wyrwich is also lead author of an examination of “Personalized Healthcare” that appeared in Applied Clinical Trials based on a panel discussion at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research annual meeting in 2011.

“Healthcare providers and systems know race, ethnicity, sex, age, comorbidity status, and other relevant information for patients,” she added. “A more holistic definition of precision or personalized healthcare can now be considered, the promise of knowing which interventions are most effective for which patients and under what circumstances. [It] also incorporates the personal needs, preferences, healthcare access, and adherence attributes that each person brings to the healthcare encounter in addition to genomic information.”

Discussants offered key perspectives on the need for and development of personalized medicine.

  • Subgroup effectiveness is already part of routine oncology care. Information derived from subgroup analysis is affecting patient care by changing therapeutic choices.
  • About two-thirds of all drugs currently in the development pipeline have an associated biomarker. Personalization and more precise delivery of care is already built into these product development programs.
Generics have become the standard of care for many diseases. Trial sponsors must identify and target subpopulations that are less than optimally responsive to existing agents or may be at increased risk due to specific genetic, molecular, or other individual factors.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

UPCOMING CONFERENCES

8th Annual Forum on Transparency and Aggregate Spend 2014
Washington, DC
August 18-20, 2014

eSource Data in Clinical Investigations
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2014

Pharmacovigilance 2014
Philadelphia, PA
September 10-11, 2014

Collaborative Research Summit
Philadelphia, PA
October 15-16, 2014

See All Conferences >>

Survey
As it creates a plan to implement the US biosimilar pathway, should FDA:
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
Create entirely its own pathway program?
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
86%
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
7%
Create entirely its own pathway program?
7%
View Results
Untitled Document
Source: Applied Clinical Trials,
Click here