CDISC Data Standard for Multiple Sclerosis Spurs Sharing of Clinical Data - Applied Clinical Trials

ADVERTISEMENT

See our 2013 Buyers Guide Digital Edition.
CDISC Data Standard for Multiple Sclerosis Spurs Sharing of Clinical Data

Source: Company News Release

 A new data standard for multiple sclerosis (MS) has been released by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC), the leading global standards organization for clinical research. When used together with the foundational CDISC clinical data standard, this therapeutic area standard allows clinical research data from multiple MS trials to be grouped for reporting, analysis, and regulatory submissions.

The standard is the result of work from organizations across the globe. Led by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC), a Critical Path Institute (C-Path) consortium, the effort drew on the ‘common data elements’ developed for MS through the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). MSOAC members with clinical expertise in MS connected with CDISC teams in the standardization process designed by the Coalition for Accelerating Standards and Therapies (CFAST) initiative. In the CFAST standardization process, standards developers work closely with clinical experts on definitions and scoping from the beginning. Dr. Rebecca Kush, CDISC President and CEO stated that this process is “key to fast-tracking therapeutic area data standards.”

“Sharing of data is central to each of C-Path’s seven consortia. We know that aggregating data for the purpose of identifying new biomarkers and developing outcome assessment tools is essential to FDA’s Critical Path Initiative and regulatory science objectives. This work requires multi-sector collaborations and we are proud to have helped create new MS standards,” stated Dr. Martha Brumfield, President and CEO of C-Path. MSOAC is C-Path’s newest consortium, funded by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society with the mission of analyzing data from MS studies to qualify a new performance measure of disability as a primary endpoint for future MS trials. The coalition is currently remapping legacy clinical data to the new MS standard in preparation for pooling data from thousands of individual patients (Read more: http://c-path.org/programs/msoac/).

Like other open CDISC data standards, the new MS standard is freely available (http://www.cdisc.org/therapeutic#MS). “This new tool is more than another resource for the MS research community, ” indicated Dr. Timothy Coetzee, Chief Advocacy, Services and Research Officer at the National MS Society. “This new MS standard signals a commitment to ensure that data does not remain in silos. By standardizing data we expect that research will move us faster toward our goal of a world free of MS.”

In addition to its value for clinical researchers worldwide, the MS data standard provides a streamlined review of drug applications within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA). "By 2017, we expect that use of data standards will be required for certain submissions, and that these requirements will continue to expand as standards are developed to address future needs," explained Dr. Douglas Throckmorton, Deputy Center Director for Regulatory Programs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The deadline is designed to focus industry attention on instituting standards expeditiously and propel the academic community to accept them as well. Some funders are offering incentives together with requirements.

“NINDS encourages investigators to plan for both standardizing and sharing data as they design their studies so that we can learn the most from each study and derive the maximum benefit from our investment of taxpayer dollars" stated Dr. Story Landis, Director, NINDS.

Adoption of the MS data standard will leverage the considerable investment in MS research by NINDS, the National MS Society, and industry, and accelerate the development of therapies for this debilitating neurologic disease.

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

UPCOMING CONFERENCES

8th Annual Forum on Transparency and Aggregate Spend 2014
Washington, DC
August 18-20, 2014

eSource Data in Clinical Investigations
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2014

Pharmacovigilance 2014
Philadelphia, PA
September 10-11, 2014

Collaborative Research Summit
Philadelphia, PA
October 15-16, 2014

See All Conferences >>

Survey
As it creates a plan to implement the US biosimilar pathway, should FDA:
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
Create entirely its own pathway program?
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
86%
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
7%
Create entirely its own pathway program?
7%
View Results
Untitled Document
Source: Company News Release,
Click here