2012 Salary and Career Development Survey - Applied Clinical Trials

ADVERTISEMENT

See our 2012 Buyers Guide Digital Edition.
Find Pharma Search Engine
2012 Salary and Career Development Survey

Source: Applied Clinical Trials


Related Articles
The 2008 Salary Survey: Now With Web-Exclusive Charts & Figures
2010 Salary & Satisfaction Survey
2006 Survey of Wages and Job Trends in the Clinical Trials Industry


ISTOCKPHOTO/THINKSTOCK
Statistics and headlines don't portray a pretty picture of the economies in Europe or in the United States. Adding in the next layer specific to the clinical research and trials industry, and the picture in the past two years continues to be complex and changing. It is not just one force—the economy—at play. Other aspects include spiking regulatory requirements; increasing global complexities; and the diminishing blockbuster drug model.

But the economy is certainly applying more than its fair share of pressure onto the conduct of drug development. The other dimensions are the technologies, outsourcing strategies, and mergers and acquisitions that have resulted from the downward forces.


Figure 1.
Annual job losses in the overall pharmaceutical industry in November 2011 were 20,000, which were significantly lower than the cuts posted from 2010's 50,000 number. The pharmaceutical industry ranked sixth on the 2010 list of annual job-cut rankings, below government, financial, retailing, aerospace/defense, and healthcare.


Figure 2.
For the time period January 2011 to July 2011, the pharmaceutical industry shed 18,264 jobs and for the same period this year 8,968. And while the reasons for job cuts were not cited by individual industries in the early August Challenger, Gray & Christmas jobs report, the top five reasons for job-cutting across industries are: restructuring, closing, cost-cutting, economic conditions, and loss of contract.

However, while job cuts may be leveling off in the pharmaceutical industry, planned hiring is not in the cards. In the jobs report, for industries planning to hire, pharmaceuticals were in the bottom three. In fact, in another report, earlier this year, smaller to mid-size biotech companies were the ones more likely to predict growth versus one-third of larger companies. In an Aon Hewitt report, less than 5% of the small- to mid-sized biopharma companies expected their staffing to decrease, compared to 15% of the larger sponsors.


Table 1.
With all of the downsizings, and seemingly less or non-growing staff to handle the workload, the larger pharmaceutical companies are tasked with merging internal capacities, weeding out redundant departments and positions, and figuring out what to do with the capabilities in which they will no longer invest. Among these companies, outsourcing is the key to getting work done.

In a January 2012 Annual Global CEO Survey from PriceWaterhouseCoopers, it found that 43% of biopharma CEOs had outsourced a business process function in 2011. This compares with all other industries, where CEOs reported 35% to the outsourced business function question.

In a survey that Applied Clinical Trials conducted in August, results found the following top three outsourced functions: full-service CRO, 41.3%; monitoring, 21.7%; and subject recruitment, 13%.


Table 2.
All of this outsourcing activity translates into additional downstream trends. The first is the ability of both the sponsor and its outsourced partner to effectively manage the outsourced relationships. And second, is that it could mean a boon of sorts to contract research organizations.

Both trends come to light in separate surveys. The first we conducted in August, where we asked: "Has your need to provide oversight of these sourcing relationships changed over the last two years?" The responses were weighted toward a definite increase at 62%.

And the second trend, what it means to CROs, the Salary and Career Development Survey conducted in September and October by CenterWatch and Applied Clinical Trials found that respondents working for CROs were significantly more likely to see a positive change in the economy compared to sponsors or investigative site respondents.


Table 3.
In his September 2012 column, Ken Getz offered a more targeted analysis of the CRO market size in the United States. From Tufts CSDD data, it surmised a total of 21,000 US jobs in the clinical research segment; 643 total companies, and the total share of US personnel comprises 13% worldwide. Its analysis, which includes regulatory services, has the clinical research market valued at $6.5 to $8 billion. Approximately 17% of the companies providing these services are publicly traded.


Figure 3.
In other reports, the forecasts are for growth in global CRO market size and penetration. Business Insights forecasts the market to be $35 billion next year, and Frost & Sullivan anticipates Compound Annual Growth Rate of 10.5% through 2017. William Blair & Co. expects the current outsourcing penetration rate to increase by a few percentage points over the next year or two, and CRO management commentary suggests that over the next five to seven years the outsourcing penetration percentage could increase to more than 60%. Its model currently anticipates a 10% increase in penetration from 2010 through 2015. What this all means is that pharma is relying on CROs and service providers more than ever in its clinical research.


ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Access Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA | July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA | August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA | August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA | August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

FindPharma
Survey
As it creates a plan to implement the US biosimilar pathway, should FDA:
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
Create entirely its own pathway program?
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
94%
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
0%
Create entirely its own pathway program?
6%
View Results
Untitled Document
Source: Applied Clinical Trials,
Click here