Lilly's Necitumumab Improves Overall Survival In Largest Ever Phase III Study In First-Line Treatment Of Stage IV Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - Applied Clinical Trials

ADVERTISEMENT

See our 2013 Buyers Guide Digital Edition.
Lilly's Necitumumab Improves Overall Survival In Largest Ever Phase III Study In First-Line Treatment Of Stage IV Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer -- Difficult-to-treat squamous NSCLC patients saw clinical benefit with necitumumab plus chemotherapy regimen --


Lilly's Necitumumab Improves Overall Survival In Largest Ever Phase III Study In First-Line Treatment Of Stage IV Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

-- Difficult-to-treat squamous NSCLC patients saw clinical benefit with necitumumab plus chemotherapy regimen --

PR Newswire

INDIANAPOLIS, May 14, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Lung cancer patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma have seen few treatment advancements over the last two decades, leaving these patients with a poor prognosis. This is in contrast to the progress seen in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).[1] Results from the largest ever Phase III trial in first-line squamous NSCLC announced by Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) today provide the first detailed look at a potential new treatment option for these patients.

Necitumumab (IMC-11F8)  is a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody designed to target the human epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR). In the Phase III SQUIRE trial, patients with stage IV metastatic squamous NSCLC showed a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (HR=0.84, p=0.012) with a median survival of 11.5 months when receiving  necitumumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as a first-line treatment, as compared to 9.9 months for those treated with chemotherapy alone. Consistent efficacy results were observed across endpoints and subgroups. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurring more frequently in patients on the necitumumab arm were hypomagnesemia and rash. The SQUIRE study results (Abstract #8008) were released in advance of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting to be held in Chicago, Ill. Additional safety and efficacy information will be presented at the meeting.

"The SQUIRE trial results offer an important step in our pursuit of improving outcomes for patients with advanced squamous NSCLC," said Richard Gaynor, M.D., senior vice president, product development and medical affairs for Lilly Oncology. "With these findings, Lilly anticipates a regulatory submission of necitumumab before the end of 2014." 

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. and most other countries. NSCLC is much more common than other types of lung cancer, and accounts for 85 percent of all lung cancer cases. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma represent about 30 percent of all patients affected by NSCLC. Advanced squamous NSCLC represents a high unmet medical need.[2] Improving treatment in this setting has been particularly challenging as patients often have co-morbidities and, unlike nonsquamous NSCLC, research has yet to confirm a molecular oncogenic target that could drive treatment decisions for patients with this disease.[3]

"While there have been several attempts to make progress to address this unmet need, clinical advances in squamous non-small cell lung cancer have been minimal in the last twenty years," said Nick Thatcher, Ph.D., FRCP., professor of oncology, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital NHS Trust in Manchester, United Kingdom and the SQUIRE principal investigator. "The addition of necitumumab to the current chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin opens the door to a potential new approach to treat patients with advanced squamous NSCLC."

About the SQUIRE Study

SQUIRE enrolled 1,093 patients (age ≥ 18 years, ECOG PS 0-2) with histologically- or cytologically-confirmed, stage IV squamous NSCLC, who had received no prior therapy for metastatic disease. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Patients were randomized to receive first-line necitumumab plus chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine and cisplatin in study Arm A, or gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy alone in study Arm B. Patients underwent  radiographic assessment of disease status (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) every six weeks (± 3 days), until radiographic documentation of progressive disease (PD). Combination chemotherapy continued for a maximum of six cycles in each arm (or until there was radiographic documentation of PD, toxicity requiring cessation, or withdrawal of consent); patients in Arm A with no progression continued to receive single-agent necitumumab (IMC-11F8) until there was radiographic documentation of PD, toxicity requiring cessation, or withdrawal of consent.

About Necitumumab

Necitumumab is a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that is designed to block the ligand binding site of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 1(EGFR). Activation of EGFR has been correlated with malignant progression, induction of angiogenesis and inhibition of apoptosis or cell death.

About Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. and most other countries, killing nearly 1.6 million people worldwide each year.[4] In the U.S., lung cancer is responsible for nearly 30 percent of all cancer deaths, more than those from breast, colon and prostate cancers combined.[5] NSCLC is much more common than other types of lung cancer, and accounts for 85 percent of all lung cancer cases. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma represent about 30 percent of all patients affected by NSCLC, while non-squamous patients represent about 70 percent.[6]

About Lilly Oncology

For more than fifty years, Lilly has been dedicated to delivering life-changing medicines and support to people living with cancer and those who care for them. Lilly is determined to build on this heritage and continue making life better for all those affected by cancer around the world. To learn more about Lilly's commitment to people with cancer, please visit www.LillyOncology.com.

About Eli Lilly and Company

Lilly is a global healthcare leader that unites caring with discovery to make life better for people around the world. We were founded more than a century ago by a man committed to creating high-quality medicines that meet real needs, and today we remain true to that mission in all our work. Across the globe, Lilly employees work to discover and bring life-changing medicines to those who need them, improve the understanding and management of disease, and give back to communities through philanthropy and volunteerism. To learn more about Lilly, please visit us at www.lilly.com and http://newsroom.lilly.com/social-channels.

P-LLY

This press release contains forward-looking statements about the potential of necitumumab as a treatment for patients with squamous non-small cell lung cancer and reflects Lilly's current beliefs. However, as with any pharmaceutical product, there are substantial risks and uncertainties in the process of development and commercialization. There is no guarantee that future studies will be positive or that necitumumab will receive regulatory approvals or prove to be commercially successful. For further discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties, see Lilly's filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Lilly undertakes no duty to update forward-looking statements.

Important Safety Information for GEMZAR® (gemcitabine for injection)

Myelosuppression is usually the dose-limiting toxicity with GEMZAR therapy.

Contraindication

GEMZAR is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to gemcitabine.

Warnings and Precautions

Patients receiving therapy with GEMZAR should be monitored closely by a physician experienced in the use of cancer chemotherapeutic agents.

Infusions of GEMZAR longer than 60 minutes or dosing more frequently than weekly resulted in an increased incidence of clinically significant hypotension, severe flu-like symptoms, myelosuppression, and asthenia. The half-life of GEMZAR is influenced by the length of the infusion.

Myelosuppression manifested by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurs with GEMZAR as a single agent, and the risks are increased when GEMZAR is combined with other cytotoxic drugs. Patients should be monitored for myelosuppression during therapy including a complete blood count with differential prior to each dose.

Pulmonary toxicity, sometimes fatal, including interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary edema, and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), has been reported. The onset of pulmonary symptoms may occur up to 2 weeks after the last dose of GEMZAR. Discontinue GEMZAR in patients who develop unexplained dyspnea, with or without bronchospasm, or have any evidence of pulmonary toxicity. In some cases, these pulmonary events can lead to fatal respiratory failure despite discontinuation of therapy.

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS), including fatalities from renal failure or the requirement of dialysis, can occur in patients treated with GEMZAR. Always monitor renal function prior to initiation of GEMZAR therapy and periodically during treatment. Use GEMZAR with caution in patients with renal impairment. Permanently discontinue GEMZAR in patients with HUS or severe renal impairment. Renal failure may not be reversible even with discontinuation of therapy.

Drug-induced liver injury, including liver failure and death, has been reported in patients receiving GEMZAR alone or in combination with other potentially hepatotoxic drugs. Administration of GEMZAR in patients with concurrent liver metastases or a preexisting medical history of hepatitis, alcoholism, or liver cirrhosis can lead to exacerbation of hepatic insufficiency. Assess hepatic function prior to initiation of GEMZAR and periodically during treatment. Discontinue GEMZAR in patients that develop severe liver injury.

GEMZAR can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise women of potential risks to the fetus.

GEMZAR is not indicated for use in combination with radiation therapy. When GEMZAR was administered within 7 days of receiving radiation therapy or concurrent with radiation therapy, toxicity of radiation therapy was increased. In a clinical trial, life-threatening mucositis, especially esophagitis and pneumonitis, occurred. Excessive toxicity has not been observed when GEMZAR is administered more than 7 days before or after radiation (nonconcurrent). Radiation recall has been reported in patients who receive GEMZAR after prior radiation.

Capillary Leak Syndrome (CLS) with severe consequences has been reported in patients receiving GEMZAR as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Discontinue GEMZAR if CLS develops during therapy.

Use in Specific Populations

GEMZAR is Pregnancy Category D. GEMZAR can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Based on its mechanism of action, GEMZAR is expected to result in adverse reproductive effects. It is not known whether GEMZAR is excreted in human milk. A decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.

The safety and efficacy of GEMZAR in pediatric patients have not been established.

No clinical studies have been conducted with gemcitabine in patients with decreased renal or hepatic function.

GEMZAR clearance is affected by age as well as gender.

Dose Modifications and Administration Guidelines

GEMZAR is for intravenous use only. Immediately and permanently discontinue GEMZAR for any of the following: unexplained dyspnea or other evidence of severe pulmonary toxicity, severe hepatic toxicity, Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, or Capillary Leak Syndrome. Consider immediate discontinuation or dose modifications for severe nonhematologic toxicity according to the Dosage and Administration guidelines in the full Prescribing Information.

Serum creatinine, potassium, calcium, and magnesium should be monitored during combination therapy with cisplatin. See the manufacturers' prescribing information for more information on any drug indicated in combination with GEMZAR.

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (%-incidence) – Patients receiving single-agent GEMZAR across 5 trials

The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3/4) in all patients receiving single-agent GEMZAR across five clinical trials were anemia (8), neutropenia (25), thrombocytopenia (5), hepatic transaminitis (increased ALT, 10; increased AST, 8), increased alkaline phosphatase (9), hyperbilirubinemia (3), nausea and vomiting (14), fever (2), and dyspnea (3).

The most common adverse reactions (all grades) in the same patient population were anemia (68), neutropenia (63), thrombocytopenia (24), increased ALT (68), increased AST (67), increased alkaline phosphatase (55), hyperbilirubinemia (13), proteinuria (45), hematuria (35), increased BUN (16), increased creatinine (8), nausea and vomiting (69), fever (41), rash (30), dyspnea (23), diarrhea (19), hemorrhage (17), infection (16), alopecia (15), stomatitis (11), somnolence (11), and paresthesias (10).

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (%-incidence) 1st-line advanced NSCLC

The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3/4, with incidence of 5% or greater) with GEMZAR plus cisplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with NSCLC in comparative trials of a 28-day regimen (GEMZAR plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone) and a 21-day regimen (GEMZAR plus cisplatin versus etoposide plus cisplatin), respectively, were neutropenia (57 vs 4, 64 vs 76); thrombocytopenia (50 vs 4, 55 vs 13); lymphopenia 28d (43 vs 17); anemia (25 vs 7, 22 vs 15); nausea and vomiting 21d (39 vs 26); nausea 28d (27 vs 21); vomiting 28d (23 vs 19); alopecia 21d (13 vs 51); neuromotor 28d (12 vs 3); hypomagnesemia 28d (7 vs 2); creatinine elevation 28d (5 vs 3); and infection (5 vs 1, 4 vs 8).

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, with incidence of 20% or greater) of the 28-day regimen (GEMZAR plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone) and the 21-day regimen (GEMZAR plus cisplatin versus etoposide plus cisplatin), respectively, were anemia (89 vs 67, 88 vs 77); neutropenia (79 vs 20, 88 vs 87); thrombocytopenia (85 vs 13, 81 vs 45); lymphopenia 28d (75 vs 51); RBC transfusion (39 vs 13, 29 vs 21); platelet transfusions (21 vs 1, 3 vs 8); increased transaminases 28d (22 vs 10); nausea 28d (93 vs 87); vomiting 28d (78 vs 71); nausea and vomiting 21d (96 vs 86); alopecia (53 vs 33, 77 vs 92); creatinine elevation (38 vs 31, 2 vs 2); paresthesias 21d (38 vs 16); neuromotor 28d (35 vs 15); hyperglycemia 28d (30 vs 23); hypomagnesemia 28d (30 vs 17); infection (18 vs 12, 28 vs 21); neurohearing 28d (25 vs 21); diarrhea (24 vs 13, 14 vs 13); proteinuria (23 vs 18, 12 vs 5); neurosensory 28d (23 vs 18); hematuria (15 vs 13, 22 vs 10); and stomatitis (14 vs 5, 20 vs 18).

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (%-incidence) 1st-line metastatic breast cancer

The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3/4, with incidence of 5% or greater) with GEMZAR plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone, respectively, for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer were neutropenia (48 vs 11); anemia (7 vs 4); thrombocytopenia (6 vs 2); alopecia (18 vs 22); fatigue (7 vs 2); increased ALT (6 vs 1); and neuropathy-sensory (6 vs 3).

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, with incidence of 20% or greater) in the same patient population were anemia (69 vs 51); neutropenia (69 vs 31); thrombocytopenia (26 vs 7); leukopenia (21 vs 12); alopecia (90 vs 92); neuropathy-sensory (64 vs 58); nausea (50 vs 31); fatigue (40 vs 28); vomiting (29 vs 15); and diarrhea (20 vs 13).

Abbreviated Adverse Reactions (%-incidence) Advanced recurrent ovarian cancer

The most severe adverse reactions (grades 3/4, with incidence of 5% or greater) with GEMZAR plus carboplatin versus carboplatin alone, respectively, for the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer were neutropenia (71 vs 12); thrombocytopenia (35 vs 11); anemia (28 vs 11); constipation (7 vs 3); nausea (6 vs 3); and vomiting (6 vs 3).

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, with incidence of 20% or greater) in the same patient population were neutropenia (90 vs 58); anemia (86 vs 75); thrombocytopenia (78 vs 57); RBC transfusion (38 vs 15); nausea (69 vs 61); alopecia (49 vs 17); vomiting (46 vs 36); constipation (42 vs 37); fatigue (40 vs 32); diarrhea (25 vs 14); and stomatitis/pharyngitis (22 vs 13).

For safety and dosing guidelines, see complete Warnings and Precautions, Adverse Reactions, and Dosage and Administration sections in the accompanying full Prescribing Information.

GC HCP ISI ALL 14MAY2013

[1] H.S. Kim et al. Personalized therapy on the horizon for squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer 80 (2013) 249– 255

[2] W Yan et al. Squamous cell carcinoma – similarities and differences among anatomical sites. Am J Cancer Res 2011;1(3):275-300

[3] H.S. Kim et al. Personalized therapy on the horizon for squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer 80 (2013) 249– 255

[4] International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012. Lung Cancer Estimated Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed February 18, 2014.  

[5] American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2012, http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-031941.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2014.  

[6] American Cancer Society, What is non-small cell lung cancer? http://www.cancer.org/cancer/lungcancer-non-smallcell/detailedguide/non-small-cell-lung-cancer-what-is-non-small-cell-lung-cancer. Accessed February 18, 2014.

Media Inquiries:


Crystal Livers-Powers, Lilly Oncology

Neil Hochman, TogoRun

317-476-4160 (mobile)

212-453-2067 (office) ; 516-784-9089 (mobile)

Email: livers_powers_crystal@lilly.com

Email: n.hochman@togorun.com

   

Eli Lilly and Company logo.

Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20031219/LLYLOGO

 

 

 

SOURCE Eli Lilly and Company

ADVERTISEMENT

blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

UPCOMING CONFERENCES

8th Annual Forum on Transparency and Aggregate Spend 2014
Washington, DC
August 18-20, 2014

eSource Data in Clinical Investigations
Philadelphia, PA
August 20-21, 2014

Pharmacovigilance 2014
Philadelphia, PA
September 10-11, 2014

Collaborative Research Summit
Philadelphia, PA
October 15-16, 2014

See All Conferences >>

Survey
As it creates a plan to implement the US biosimilar pathway, should FDA:
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
Create entirely its own pathway program?
Borrow heavily from EMA's pathway program?
87%
Borrow lightly from EMA's pathway program?
6%
Create entirely its own pathway program?
8%
View Results
Untitled Document

Click here