MANA RBM, Denver, CO, USA
Oversight Method Identifies Critical Errors Missed by Traditional Monitoring Approaches
Study Health Check provides early identification of issues related to protocol deviations and determines objective measures of site-specific versus study-wide performance.
De-Risking Trials with Science-Driven Oversight
Identifying the ‘significant six’ areas of clinical study conduct to mitigate risk.
Adopting eISF for Remote Quality Oversight of Trials
Exploring the use of electronic investigator site files for review of regulatory documents and informed consents.
Adopting eISF for Remote Review of Regulatory Documents and Informed Consents
Penelope Manasco, CEO of MANA UBM, answer thorny questions about adopting electronic investigator site files in clinical research.
The Risks of KRI in RBM
Penelope Manasco, CEO of MANA UBM, disputes recommendations made by the original authors she finds to be problematic and worthy of further discussion.
What is the Right “EASY Button” Approach for Research Oversight and RBM?
CEO of MANA UBM, Penelope K. Manasco, explores the different approaches to determine what the right 'easy button' is to push to achieve effective clinical trial conduct and oversight.
Does Your CRO Comply with ICH E6?
With the new regulatory guidelines concerning GCP, questions have arisen as to how best RBM plans can comply. These questions and answers will assist sponsors in assuring compliance.
Subject Profile Analyzing Risk Saves Time for Monitors
In a comparison study of source data review (SDV) methods, this new process demonstrates the value of using well-planned data visualization tools to provide better quality oversight versus remote eCRF review or onsite SDV.
Quality Remote Monitoring: The Tools of the Game
Outlining those technologies best able to raise the data and process quality of risk-based monitoring.
A Plea to RBM Tech Vendors
A risk-based approach to quality trial oversight, adopted by the FDA and EMA, has resulted in an array of new technology solutions being released.