Enrolled Patient Numbers
Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) have constituted the foundation for new drug approvals for over fifty years.
Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) have constituted the foundation for new drug approvals for over fifty years. An Institute of Medicines (IOM) report concluded though in 2008 that RCTs may become unsustainable because of the time and expense involved. In addition, as therapies become more targeted, the financial calculus may make these RCTs even more problematic.
Some industry critics have argued that the increasing number of patients in Phase III clinical trials is actually an industry strategy to improve the statistical strength of clinical trial results and RCTs will actually have to continue to increase in size. As differences between active and non-active arms become more difficult to establish, larger sample sizes are used to improve the chances of reporting statistically significant differences.1 Rather than a response to scientific necessity, the growing number of enrolled patients is a conscious strategy to improve the chances of a favorable regulatory approval decision.
ClinicalTrials.gov reports the actual number of targeted enrolled patients. ClinicalTrials.gov is a federally mandated database with a large, and growing, number of mandatory data fields. One of these mandated fields is number of patients. Another is therapeutic area. These data fields are particularly robust, with missing data under three percent. ClinicalTrials.gov requires that information be reported for any study operating under the auspices of the FDA. This analysis examines Phase III studies conducted by commercial pharmaceutical companies.
The average number of enrolled patients has not changed since 2008 when the enrolled patients variable became mandatory. Only one MedRHA therapeutic area--vascular disorders--shows a statistically significant difference from the overall results for the six years covered by the analysis. However, the number of patients has actually declined over the period in question.
1Adrian G. Sacher, Lisa W. Le, Natasha B. Leighl. Shifting patterns in the interpretation of phase III clinical trial outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the bar is dropping. Journal of Clinical Oncology. March 2014.
Average Patient Enrollment per Phase III Study by Year
Source: Department of Health Policy and Public Policy, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA
Putting Collective Insights Into Action to Advance Cancer Care: Key Examples From ASCO 2025
June 27th 2025At ASCO 2025, clinical operations leaders gained critical insights into how AI tools, bispecific antibodies, and evolving treatment paradigms are reshaping trial design, endpoint selection, and patient stratification.
Unifying Industry to Better Understand GCP Guidance
May 7th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, David Nickerson, head of clinical quality management at EMD Serono; and Arlene Lee, director of product management, data quality & risk management solutions at Medidata, discuss the newest ICH E6(R3) GCP guidelines as well as how TransCelerate and ACRO have partnered to help stakeholders better acclimate to these guidelines.
Funding Cuts Threaten Diversity in Clinical Research
June 27th 2025In this video interview, Kyle McAllister, co-founder, CEO, Trially, discusses how recent federal funding cuts are likely to undermine research focused on underrepresented populations, and why long-term investment in community-based studies is essential to closing persistent health equity gaps.
