Data capture is no longer the bottleneck, and whether the lag between a signal and a decision shrinks depends on signal design, AI governance, and vendor orchestration.
|Articles|April 22, 2014
Video Consent Proving an Obstacle in India Trials
In November 2013, India's Drug Controller General required that all clinical trials must record on video a participant's informed consent.
Advertisement
In November 2013, India's Drug Controller General required that all clinical trials must record on video a participant's informed consent, which according to a recent article, is driving recruitment rates down.
Physician investigators report the reasons patients are declining clinical trials because of the video recorded consent. Those reasons include, they believe the videos could be leaked; tampered with or misused. Also, social and religious reasons, as well as poor self image during a sickness. The physicians in the article report ranges between 10%-40% of patients declining to participate in the clinical trial after learning of the video consent requirement.
While some believe the video consent has a noble intent, the questions behind the ethics of not allowing participants the decision to opt-out of the video requirement, as well as the long-term effects on science are being debated.
Read the full story
Advertisement
Related to this article
In this Q&A, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, discusses what changes when AI is embedded across protocol strategy, data infrastructure, and workflow tools at once, where governance frameworks tend to fall short, and why CROs must orchestrate AI ecosystems rather than simply aggregate them.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine what policy changes would help community and rural institutions join research, how Walmart is expanding clinical trial centers into three more states, and how FDA approved Ilumya for adults with active psoriatic arthritis.
The planned sites in Livonia, Las Vegas, and San Antonio would expand a partnership that places clinical research and health screenings inside Walmart stores.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, calls for safe harbor protections, CMS reimbursement safeguards, and funding mechanisms modeled on EHR meaningful use to help community and rural institutions participate in research on par with academic centers.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why community and rural patients lack access to research as a care option, what makes AI assistants trustworthy in regulated trials, and how FDA draft guidance could let gene editing therapies cover patient-specific variants.
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, explains why patients in community and rural settings too often lack access to clinical research as a care option, and how closing that gap could improve outcomes and lower long-term costs.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Building AI Assistants Clinical Trial Teams Can Trust: Q&A with E.K. Koh, Suvoda
2
From Signal to Action: Why Faster Trial Data Isn’t Producing Faster Decisions
3
What Needs to Happen Beyond the Clinical Trial Modernization Act
4
Walmart and Care Access Plan Three More Clinical Trial Centers in Michigan, Nevada, and Texas
5