
Metrics & Benchmarks
Latest News

Workflow in the Age of AI

What the "Dead Time" Problem Actually Is and Why It Matters for Real-Time Monitoring

ACT Brief: Inspection Readiness Throughout Lifecycle, AI Churn and Operational Discipline, and Global Trial Stakeholder Alignment

What Inspection Readiness Actually Looks Like When It's Built In From the Start

The AI Churn Trap in Life Sciences and How to Break It

Shorts










Podcasts
Videos
All News

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why execution failures originate upstream despite surfacing downstream, how European health data frameworks transform CRO roles, and why US trial competitiveness varies by development phase.

The European Health Data Space reshapes CRO operations by transitioning them from data custodians to regulated users accessing data within secure, auditable environments, enabling cross-border research but requiring substantial investment in compliance, standardization, and methodological rigor.

In this video interview, Elizabeth Walsh, founder of Walsh Clinical Advisory and co-author of The Clinical Execution Blueprint, explains why execution failures surface where they're visible but originate where conditions were set—and why clinical operations leaders too often inherit problems they had no hand in creating.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine where sponsor capability gaps accumulate in protocol execution, how partnerships are embedding trials in community settings, and whether Project Trialblazer can compete with faster international pathways.

Bayer and Henry Ford Health announce a strategic research alliance, while Massive Bio and FOMAT launch an AI-driven oncology prescreening pilot—both targeting barriers that keep eligible patients from reaching clinical trials.

In this video interview, Elizabeth Walsh, founder of Walsh Clinical Advisory and co-author of The Clinical Execution Blueprint, identifies where the most consequential capability gaps accumulate—from protocol-to-execution bridging to how sponsor oversight roles are structured and staffed.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how early assumptions govern development outcomes, why single pivotal trials require portfolio recruitment with integrated technology, and how risk frameworks must embed quality into design from the start.

In this Q&A, Gaynor Anders, chief delivery officer at Trialbee, discusses how the FDA's single pivotal trial shift is raising the stakes on patient recruitment, why the study-by-study model has persisted for so long, and what program-level recruitment actually requires from sponsors in terms of infrastructure, data sharing, and organizational change.

In this video interview, Elizabeth Walsh, founder of Walsh Clinical Advisory and co-author of The Clinical Execution Blueprint, makes the case that the assumptions accumulated at the moment of a product development decision govern everything that follows—and why deferring that work doesn't save time, it just makes it more expensive to fix.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how outsourcing transfers accountability in sponsor organizations, why biomarker strategy requires understanding tumor biology beyond single targets, and FDA clearance for a novel sciatica treatment.

Phase III oncology setbacks often reflect incomplete biological understanding rather than target failures, but robust biomarker strategy and multi-dimensional patient selection developed early in development can strengthen pivotal trial design and increase success.

In this video interview, Elizabeth Walsh, founder of Walsh Clinical Advisory and co-author of The Clinical Execution Blueprint, explains why the belief that outsourcing execution transfers accountability is the most consequential and least examined gap in how sponsor organizations are structured.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how programmatic recruitment requires portfolio funding and behavioral readiness integration, why clinical R&D modernization stalls without systems-level thinking, and FDA's traditional approval of a kidney function-preserving therapy.

Clinical R&D modernization stalls through incremental optimization of individual workflows, but meaningful systemic change requires leaders to visualize structural relationships, understand hidden incentives, and identify leverage points that benefit the whole system rather than parts.

As the FDA's single-trial standard raises the cost of recruitment failure and diversity expectations intensify, sponsors are under pressure to move beyond study-by-study outreach toward programmatic, relationship-based approaches that treat patient engagement as a long-term strategic capability rather than a per-study operational task.






















