
Metrics & Benchmarks
Latest News

FDA Makes Case for Overhauling Early Clinical Development to Reclaim US Leadership

What a Lean Development Model Actually Means for Biotech Operations Today

ACT Brief: Commercial Strategy Shaping Early Clinical Development, Real-Time Trials Require Operational Infrastructure, and AI Site Engagement Gap

Real-Time Trials Need More Than AI: Why Operational Trial Infrastructure Matters

Why Commercialization Readiness Can No Longer Wait Until End of Phase II

Shorts










Podcasts
Videos
All News

In today's ACT Brief, we examine the most consequential risks facing early-stage biotech development, why recruitment spending targets the wrong funnel level, and industry deal speculation clarifications.

Under-enrollment isn't news to teams running oncology trials, and the instinct is to spend more on reach. The evidence, however, says the biggest leak is something else entirely and that most recruitment budgets focus on the least valuable part of the problem.

In this video interview, Stella K. Vnook, PhD, CEO of Kaida BioPharma and founder of Aviva Ventures, identifies the funding gap and indication selection trade-offs as the most consequential risks facing early-stage programs today—and why great assets still fall behind when those decisions go wrong.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how declining NIH funding is reshaping biotech development strategy, why execution planning must begin at the business decision not at study startup, and why legacy R&D platforms are failing biologics complexity.

In this Q&A, Elizabeth Walsh, PMP, ACRP-CP, founder of Walsh Clinical Advisory and co-author of The Clinical Execution Blueprint, discusses the persistent misconceptions about sponsor accountability, why execution gaps originate long before study startup, and what genuine inspection readiness looks like when it is built in from the outset.

In this video interview, Stella K. Vnook, PhD, CEO of Kaida BioPharma and founder of Aviva Ventures, explains how declining NIH funding, late-stage pharma acquisition strategies, and global operating pressures are forcing sponsors to move faster and more capital-efficiently toward clinical inflection points.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine the $500,000-per-day cost of execution delays and protocol variance at the point of care, why oncology real-world data requires hybrid clinical expertise with technology, and scaling challenges as trial data volumes continue to grow.

Real-world oncology data requires hybrid curation combining clinical expertise with technology to address variability in documentation, missing data, and complex concepts like lines of therapy that are often implicit rather than explicitly recorded in EHRs.

With delayed trials carrying a significant cost burden, poor execution at the point of care is a liability no AI discovery tool can fix.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how a gradual, win-driven strategy scales real-time monitoring adoption, why consumer wearables need rigorous fit-for-purpose validation, and an FDA committee's favorable vote on Replimune's oncolytic virus combination therapy.

Consumer-grade wearables offer promise for reducing trial burden and improving engagement, but accuracy and reliability vary substantially by device, measurement, and population, requiring rigorous fit-for-purpose validation and careful endpoint selection before integration into regulated research.

In this video interview, Raviv Pryluk, CEO and co-founder of PhaseV, outlines a gradual, win-driven strategy for making real-time monitoring stick—starting in early phases and building toward pivotal trials with the right technology partners and a network effect that scales.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why real-time monitoring scales only through coordinated ecosystem efforts, how organizational failures not models explain weak AI results, and FDA's advisory panel peptide compounding decision.

As agentic AI, automated data harmonization, and real-time monitoring reshape clinical development, the organizations seeing meaningful results are those that have invested in unified data infrastructure and disciplined governance rather than cycling through pilots without the foundation to scale them.

In this video interview, Raviv Pryluk, CEO and co-founder of PhaseV, makes the case that scaling real-time data review requires an ecosystem approach—bringing regulators, sponsors, CROs, and technology vendors together in a shared learning environment rather than letting progress remain siloed.






















