
Metrics & Benchmarks
Latest News

Recruitment in the Age of AI: Q&A with John Worden, Javara

What It Actually Means to Embed the Patient Voice in Trial Design

ACT Brief: Explainable AI for Patient Subgroups, Participant Understanding and Engagement, and FDA Leadership Stabilization

From Participation to Understanding: Reframing Engagement in Clinical Trials

Beyond Compliance: NetraMark's Joseph Geraci, PhD, on Making AI-Driven Patient Subgroups Explainable

Shorts










Podcasts
Videos
All News

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how regulatory guidance and financial evidence enable RBQM adoption, why site payment performance remains a competitive differentiator, and a collaboration advancing an inhaled approach to cystic fibrosis.

In this Q&A, Patrick Mizer, chief technology officer at Ledger Run, discusses how payment reliability has become a competitive differentiator in site selection, why decades of disconnected workflows have made payment inconsistency a structural problem, and where AI is delivering real value in the high-friction parts of clinical trial payments.

In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how ICH E6(R3) and new empirical evidence of RBQM's net financial impact give sponsors the tools they need to build the multi-functional buy-in required for successful adoption—and why RBQM only delivers full value when it replaces, not supplements, traditional monitoring.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine value hidden in the RBQM financial model, why rare disease research leads on genuine patient partnership, and how safety concerns shape IBD treatment decisions despite clinical efficacy.

Patient-centricity remains largely consultative in most clinical research, yet rare disease communities demonstrate that genuine partnership from protocol inception improves feasibility, reduces unnecessary burden, and identifies outcomes that matter to patients themselves.

In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD discuss what the RBQM financial model left out—reduced rework, improved data integrity, and inspection readiness—and why those excluded factors could represent even greater value than what was modeled.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why time savings dominates the financial case for RBQM investment, how the FDA is strengthening inspection access and data integrity review, and how data governance models shape real-world evidence quality.

Senior FDA leaders outline concrete steps to strengthen inspection coverage and data integrity review as the globalization of clinical research strains the agency's oversight capacity.

In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain why time savings dominates the eNPV model for RBQM—and what that means for how sponsors should frame the internal case for investment.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why many trial failures trace to human readiness gaps rather than process design alone, how CRO consolidation expands early-phase capacity, and how AI-enabled patient matching is reshaping recruitment economics.

As sponsors push for faster, more representative studies, AI-enabled matching and EHR integration are emerging as operational levers, but bias, explainability, and governance will determine whether the technology scales.

The all-cash transaction adds a good laboratory practice-compliant bioanalytical laboratory, a 200-bed clinical pharmacology unit, and a biospecimen storage facility to Fortrea's early-phase development network.

This pilot episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials introduces a framework from Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., exploring why operational failures in clinical trials often trace back to gaps in human readiness rather than process design alone.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how eNPV modeling and real-world data finally put numbers on RBQM value, why static budgeting masks true site costs, and GSK advancing an mRNA flu vaccine candidate to late-stage testing.

In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how combining real-world deployment data with eNPV modeling finally made it possible to put a number on the financial value of RBQM—and why oncology was chosen as a conservative starting point.























