Key Takeaways
- FDA publishes over 200 complete response letters (CRLs): The agency released CRLs from 2020 to 2024 to improve transparency and regulatory predictability in drug development.
- Common issues identified: 48% of CRLs cited both safety and efficacy deficiencies, emphasizing the need for strong data and well-executed trial design.
- Industry-wide learning opportunity: Public access to CRLs may help developers avoid repeated mistakes and align submissions more closely with FDA expectations.
The FDA has published over 200 complete response letters (CRLs) issued between 2020 and 2024 in response to drug and biologic applications, aiming to increase transparency and enhance regulatory predictability, the agency stated in a press release.
How Will the FDA’s Public Release of CRLs Impact Drug Development?
Previously, CRLs were shared only with product sponsors, limiting broader industry visibility into the specific deficiencies that prevented approval. By releasing these letters to the public, the FDA said it hopes to reduce repeated submission errors and foster a more informed and efficient drug development landscape.1
“For far too long, drug developers have been playing a guessing game when navigating the FDA,” said Marty Makary, MD, MPH, FDA Commissioner, in a press release.
What is a CRL?
A CRL is a notice sent out by the FDA stating that a potential drug will not be approved in its current formation. However, it is important to note that a CRL is not an all-out rejection of an application.
The main goal of a CRL is to serve as the FDA’s mechanism for outlining necessary changes or additional data needed for potential approval in a future review cycle. Receiving a CRL is also fairly common in the drug development process.
Between 2018 and 2022, 37% of biologics license applications (BLAs) and new drug applications (NDAs) were issued a CRL.2 Common reasons for a CRL include safety concerns, trial design flaws, and manufacturing gaps.
Transparency Gaps Have Long Impacted Industry Learning
According to the FDA, limited access to CRLs in the past has allowed sponsors to downplay or omit the agency’s concerns. A 2015 analysis found that 85% of safety and efficacy issues cited in CRLs were not publicly disclosed by sponsors.