The confirmatory study—which tracked 18 months of data—helped clear the way for new Alzheimer’s drug.
FDA’s full, or traditional, approval late last week of Eisai and Biogen’s new Alzheimer’s disease treatment, Leqembi, converted an earlier conditional approval status with further data from a multi-regional study of nearly 1,800 patients. Results indicated that the drug slows the rate of cognitive and functional decline in early Alzheimer’s patients, compared to placebo, but also raised certain safety concerns. The decision paves the way for wider coverage of the drug by Medicare and establishes a process for further clinical testing and evaluation of treatments for this widespread, debilitating condition.1
Eisai and Biogen had gained FDA accelerated approval for Leqembi in January based on evidence from a Phase II study. However, reimbursement was limited by the earlier decision of the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to pay for Alzheimer’s drugs only for those patients enrolled in clinical trials to further test the safety and efficacy of the therapy. This approach utilized CMS’ Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) policy, which limits access to certain innovative medical products while clinical trials continue and is most commonly used for new medical devices. It was very unusual and controversial for CMS to curb coverage for a drug granted accelerated approval by FDA, and reflects concerns about potentially huge outlays for Medicare on a therapy that may have limited efficacy and potential adverse effects.
Now with the sponsor presenting trial data supporting full FDA approval, CMS said it will provide appropriate, broader coverage for Leqembi. But reimbursement still will be contingent on physicians enrolling patients in registries so that CMS may track the effectiveness of the treatment and emergence of side effects going forward with broader patient use.2
Study confirms effect
Eisai set the stage for FDA full approval by conducting a large Phase III placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study in North America, Europe, and Asia. Study 301 Clarity AD enrolled 1,795 patients with early Alzheimer’s disease, as seen in measures of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage disease. Half of the participants received treatment and half placebo, with further stratification based on severity of disease, use of other medications, geographical region, and evidence of relevant genetic markers.3
FDA approval of Leqembi was based on data from 18 months of treatment indicating that the drug may slow progression of Alzheimer’s symptoms, as measured on global cognitive and functional scales.4 An FDA advisory committee had voted on June 9 that study results verified clinical benefit of Leqembi for its indicated use. However, the treatment will carry a boxed warning alerting patients and prescribers to the potential risks for individuals experiencing ARIA (amyloid-related imaging abnormalities) that may be associated with headaches, dizziness, as well as more serious brain edema. FDA recommends testing for a certain genetic marker that may be related to this condition.
Use and prescribing of the drug are uncertain, as many questions remain to be addressed concerning long-term effectiveness and prevalence and severity of side effects. And while Medicare and insurers will pay for much of the proposed $26,000 a year drug cost, patients will be responsible for considerable cost-sharing for the therapy, as well as a range of clinical visits and tests. At the same time, the relatively small positive effect on patient health may deter prescribing until additional data emerges. Utilization also may rise in the future with the development of new formulations that don’t require such frequent infusion, and more advanced diagnostics may better identify patients most likely to benefit and less likely to suffer serious side effects from the drug.
Jill Wechsler is ACT's Washington Correspondent and can be reached at jillwechsler7@gmail.com.
References
2. https://www.cms.gov/files/document/fact-sheet-june-2023.pdf
Including Women of Childbearing Age in Clinical Research
March 26th 2024In recognition of International Women's Month, we're featuring this recent talk between Associate Editor Miranda Schmalfuhs and Marie Teil, Global Head of UCB’s Women of Childbearing Age Program. They speak about the specific challenges women with chronic illnesses face when accessing appropriate treatment and participating in clinical trials, UCB's Women of Childbearing Age Program and it’s most successful strategies, and much more.
Regulatory Compliance With eCOAs
April 26th 2024In the fourth and final part of this video interview with ACT editor Andy Studna, Melissa Mooney, director, eCOA sales engineering, IQVIA discusses how the regulatory stance on electronic clinical outcome assessments has changed over the years and what it could look like in the future.
Improving Engagement While Maintaining Data Integrity & Validity
March 19th 2024In recognition of Women's Health Month, we're featuring this recent talk between Associate Editor Miranda Schmalfuhs and uMotif's Chief Product Officer, Julia Lakeland, discuss new technologies improving patient engagement and reducing the emotional and logistical burdens of participation, ethical considerations that should be addressed when implementing those technologies, while ensuring patient privacy, and much more.
Using Patient Reported Outcomes in Dermatology Trials
April 25th 2024In part 3 of this video interview with ACT editor Andy Studna, Melissa Mooney, director, eCOA sales engineering, IQVIA sheds light on the unique challenges of dermatology trials and how clinical outcome assessments can be implemented in them.