In part 2 of this conversation, Moultrie, CCRP, senior director, DEI & community engagement, Javara discusses the guidance and how it will affect sponsors moving forward.
ACT: What are your thoughts on the FDA’s recently released Diversity Action Plan Guidance? How will this affect sponsors moving forward?
Moultrie: I am a strong proponent for what gets measured gets done, so I strongly believe having the industry guidance—once finalized and put into action—it'll require a level of accountability that I think a lot of folks may have been working towards or figuring out, but having that requirement makes it real. I think it sets a precedent for what has to happen, and I think folks will start moving more intently towards those goals. It's when somethings are nice to have versus when it's a must have—I think we move differently, we allocate resources differently, we discuss planning, and things like that a bit differently when things are required. That requirement piece, I think, is necessary, and we've seen the shift already with just the guidance coming—the ways in which things are changing. Once the guidance of finalized and it's moved out, I think that that change and that shift is going to happen much more robustly.
I think for our sponsor partners, one of the biggest things to consider is how it's going to affect implementation. We may have to adjust how we handle timelines and how we set these goals, there may likely be more time spent up front and figuring out of how to disseminate and when we're going to do trial selection, where are we going to place these trials, who are the investigators are going to look at? But again, that level of accountability, I think, is going to force a lot of us, and not just sponsors and CROs, at the site side as well, to do things a bit differently and consider things a bit differently and prepare differently so that we can meet those goals.
Funding Cuts Threaten Diversity in Clinical Research
June 27th 2025In this video interview, Kyle McAllister, co-founder, CEO, Trially, discusses how recent federal funding cuts are likely to undermine research focused on underrepresented populations, and why long-term investment in community-based studies is essential to closing persistent health equity gaps.
Unifying Industry to Better Understand GCP Guidance
May 7th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, David Nickerson, head of clinical quality management at EMD Serono; and Arlene Lee, director of product management, data quality & risk management solutions at Medidata, discuss the newest ICH E6(R3) GCP guidelines as well as how TransCelerate and ACRO have partnered to help stakeholders better acclimate to these guidelines.
2025 DIA Annual Meeting: Why AI and Automation Are Set to Become the New Normal in Clinical Research
June 20th 2025Peter Ronco, CEO, Emmes, shares his long-term vision for artificial intelligence in clinical research, from making automation routine to improving drug discovery, transforming regulatory oversight, reducing animal testing, and promoting ethical, equitable data use worldwide.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
FDA to Launch National Priority Voucher Program to Speed Drug Reviews for Critical Therapies
June 18th 2025Under the new initiative, companies may receive a voucher enabling FDA review to be shortened from the standard 10–12 months to just 1–2 months following final application submission if the drug addresses US national health priorities.