Commentary|Videos|August 22, 2024

Ashley Moultrie of Javara Shares Thoughts on FDA’s Diversity Action Plan Guidance

In part 2 of this conversation, Moultrie, CCRP, senior director, DEI & community engagement, Javara discusses the guidance and how it will affect sponsors moving forward.

ACT: What are your thoughts on the FDA’s recently released Diversity Action Plan Guidance? How will this affect sponsors moving forward?

Moultrie: I am a strong proponent for what gets measured gets done, so I strongly believe having the industry guidance—once finalized and put into action—it'll require a level of accountability that I think a lot of folks may have been working towards or figuring out, but having that requirement makes it real. I think it sets a precedent for what has to happen, and I think folks will start moving more intently towards those goals. It's when somethings are nice to have versus when it's a must have—I think we move differently, we allocate resources differently, we discuss planning, and things like that a bit differently when things are required. That requirement piece, I think, is necessary, and we've seen the shift already with just the guidance coming—the ways in which things are changing. Once the guidance of finalized and it's moved out, I think that that change and that shift is going to happen much more robustly.

I think for our sponsor partners, one of the biggest things to consider is how it's going to affect implementation. We may have to adjust how we handle timelines and how we set these goals, there may likely be more time spent up front and figuring out of how to disseminate and when we're going to do trial selection, where are we going to place these trials, who are the investigators are going to look at? But again, that level of accountability, I think, is going to force a lot of us, and not just sponsors and CROs, at the site side as well, to do things a bit differently and consider things a bit differently and prepare differently so that we can meet those goals.


Related to this article

© putilov_denis - © putilov_denis - stock.adobe.com
Real-time clinical trials require standardized digital data capture at the point of care through scaled eSource-EDC-EHR integration, but progress stalls because competing standards lack regulatory enforcement and one-off system integrations cannot scale beyond single studies without industry-wide alignment and legal clarity on data ownership.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.