|Articles|September 28, 2017

EFPIA Report Pinpoints Risks From EMA Relocation

Author(s)Philip Ward

A new 25-page report commissioned by the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) has highlighted the serious risks posed to public health by the relocation of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The relocation will restrict the agency’s ability to call on and manage the network of expertise it relies on and limit staff retention and capacity, warns the authors.

Compiled by the consulting firm Charles Rivers Associates, the study analyzes the range of activities undertaken by the EMA and considers the impact of the move on continuity, patients, and approval of new medicines.

The report identifies two key areas-the evaluation of applications for marketing authorization and monitoring the safety of medicines across their lifecycle-as having the most significant detrimental effect on public health due to the relocation.

Delays in evaluating applications for marketing authorization mean delays in access to new medicines for patients across Europe, while disruption to critical safety functions can lead to delays in identification, management, and communication of safety issues, thereby putting patients at risk, according to the authors.

Transitional arrangements must be put in place to ensure the EMA has the time to manage the relocation and safeguard public health, they stated.

"The EMA plays a key role in Europe's health, ensuring that medicines are safe, effective, and of high quality,” noted EFPIA Director General Nathalie Moll. “This report underlines the importance of both the location decision and transitional arrangements to the agency's future. Supporting the continuity of its critical functions, its ability to retain staff, and access expert networks is central to its future and to public health."

To download a copy of the report, click here.


Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.