The Faster Clinical Trials Act would create an FDA Center for Clinical Trial Innovation and aims to cut trial costs and enrollment time by at least 30%.
|Articles|June 27, 2016
EMA Issues Statement on Brexit
Author(s)Philip Ward
The agency offers its official comment following the UK's historic vote last week to leave the European Union.
Advertisement
In the wake of the dramatic result of Thursday’s UK referendum on Brexit, the London-based European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued an official statement today to the press. In an email sent to Applied Clinical Trials in response to a request for comment on the agency's potential relocation, the EMA gave the following statement:
We respect the UK citizens’ decision to no longer be a part of the European Union.
The people in the UK have taken their vote and it is now up to the UK government to decide how to act upon the outcome of the referendum.
Article 50 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU foresees the procedure to be followed in case a Member State notifies the European Council of its decision to withdraw from the Union. No country has ever decided to leave the EU, so there is no precedent for this situation. It is too early to foresee the implications of this decision and we will be in close contact with the EU institutions. When we have concrete information, we will share it with our stakeholders.
EMA will continue with its work with the goal to protect human and animal health and ensure access to medicines that are safe, effective and of good quality.
Advertisement
Related to this article
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine how sites can avoid both fear-driven and overly aggressive AI adoption, why community-based research needs sustained financial investment, and why patient access matters more than organizational size.
Pacing obesity trial enrollment, anchoring eligibility to stable real-world therapies, and building site and physician relationships improve retention and data quality more than aggressive recruitment or restrictive exclusion criteria do.
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Syneos Health and Optum outline a joint model for trial planning, recruitment and site access, with no financial terms or timelines disclosed.
AstraZeneca and Oracle Outline AI Collaboration for Clinical Trial Recruitment and Safety Monitoring
What sponsors and sites should know about the AstraZeneca-Oracle AI collaboration on trial recruitment, safety monitoring and data governance.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
2
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
3
Building Standardized Evidence for eSource-Enabled Clinical Trials: Multi-Site Validation of a Clinical Research Coordinator Satisfaction Methodology
4
Syneos Health, Optum Partner on Adaptive Clinical Development Model
5