Aardvark released exploratory data from its stopped Phase 3 HERO trial in Prader-Willi syndrome after FDA lifted the hold, and plans a redesigned Phase 3.
|Articles|August 17, 2015
EORTC Prepares to Show How to Navigate Regulatory Triangle
Author(s)Philip Ward
How can you navigate the regulatory triangle safely?
Advertisement
How can you navigate the regulatory triangle safely? Who better to address this question than the respected Brussels-based European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).
For anybody seeking regulatory tips and tricks on clinical trials, in vitro diagnostics and data protection, EORTC is staging a workshop in Brussels on 2 December. During the same week, it is organizing two-day meetings about innovation and biomarkers in cancer drug development and markers in cancer diagnostic development.
Among its partners in these events are the European Medicines Agency, the National Cancer Institute, the American Association for Cancer Research, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The EORTC is an independent research organization dedicated to investigator driven clinical trials and translational research. Consisting of both a network and a coordinating scientific and operational infrastructure, it seeks to not only establish ‘state-of-the-art’ treatments but also ensure that new cancer agents are developed and tested efficiently with the aim of minimizing delays between laboratory discovery and their therapeutic benefit for patients.
Advertisement
Related to this article
Clinical trials capture data faster than ever, but the real bottleneck is the distance between data capture and a decision teams can trust.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why the future of AI in trials is a trusted orchestration system rather than a single model, how coordinators rate eSource-enabled workflows, and what a bipartisan bill proposes for reusable trial networks.
The Faster Clinical Trials Act would create an FDA Center for Clinical Trial Innovation and aims to cut trial costs and enrollment time by at least 30%.
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine how sites can avoid both fear-driven and overly aggressive AI adoption, why community-based research needs sustained financial investment, and why patient access matters more than organizational size.
Pacing obesity trial enrollment, anchoring eligibility to stable real-world therapies, and building site and physician relationships improve retention and data quality more than aggressive recruitment or restrictive exclusion criteria do.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Building Standardized Evidence for eSource-Enabled Clinical Trials: Multi-Site Validation of a Clinical Research Coordinator Satisfaction Methodology
2
Clinical Trials Do Not Have a Data Problem, They Have a Decision-Readiness Problem
3
ACT Brief: Orchestrated AI Clinical Environments, eSource Coordinator Satisfaction, and Faster Clinical Trials Act
4
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
5