News|Articles|August 8, 2022

ePROs in Oncology: Breaking Through Barriers for Better Drug Development and Higher Quality Care

Industry now leveraging reporting system to empower patients and improve research.

In the new paradigm of patient-centered research and care, the inclusion of patient reported outcomes (PROs) are central to evaluating new drugs, particularly in fields like oncology, where cancer patients’ diseases can be especially debilitating and affect their overall quality of life and life expectancy. Historically, trial participants battling cancer have also been burdened with reporting important toxicities and side effects directly to their providers. Incomplete reporting, patient bias and inadequate trial investigator communication can result in lack of information that could potentially improve drug labeling claims and inform researchers and regulators in the development and approval of new drugs,

To address these challenges, sponsors are now leveraging ePROs to create the opportunity to empower patients to self-report symptoms without bias. These tools can reduce cancer patient reporting burden and reluctance while capturing the best information on subjective symptoms. ePRO allows patients to easily report their conditions, symptoms, side effects, drug timing, directly from electronic devices.

Understanding adoption challenges in oncology

The standard paper-based practices that clinicians use to report patient toxicity symptoms and side effects in cancer trials are, by today’s standards, complex and inefficient. Interest in collecting PROs in trials has been growing over the last several years amongst clinicians and patients as well as regulators. However, the concern around potentially incomplete and inconsistent communication between patients and providers remains an obstacle to implementation. From navigating a multitude of chemotherapy and other appointments to the sheer impact of the disease on everyday quality of life, the burden on cancer patients to report outcomes consistently and regularly through traditional methods is especially high. At the same time, failing to collect that data could hurt the completeness of the study that will be essential for regulatory approval down the line. Practitioners need entirely accurate and well-encompassed PRO data to make trial management decisions and compile a submission. As the clinical trial space becomes more digitally driven, ePROs are a logical progression that answers these challenges. ePROs can be completed from the convenience of the patient’s home and drive compliance through the use of automated reporting windows, and reminder alerts. Information from ePROs is immediately accessible to Investigators, easily stored and transmitted, and does not require research personnel to manually enter data into a database.

Breaking down barriers for cancer patients with ePROs

PROs allow the possibility for patients to share with ease their symptoms, side effects, drug timing, etc., directly from technologies, such as smartphones and wearable devices. With patient centricity being at the core of most clinical trial designs today, ePROs ensure that participants have the best experience while providing clinicians visibility into the patient experience in order to deliver optimal care.This is because clinicians can directly monitor variables such as their patients’ tolerance, response, and symptoms, related to the disease itself or treatment effects. Capturing insights electronically enhances this process by enabling more frequent and holistic data reviews which can contribute to better clinical efficacy and improved outcomes while empowering patients. For example, the use of ePROs in studies of patients with advanced cancer can potentially contribute to reduced emergency department visits and improved one-year survival compared with traditional clinical care.

Creating a better future for cancer care

It is critical to continue to take advantage of technologies that promote quality care for cancer patients. ePROs offer a mutually beneficial solution for patients and providers for capturing the patient experience in a consistent, well-rounded, and simple way. Simultaneously, continuing to enable patients to self-report side effects and symptoms will help clinicians to holistically capture and report toxicities. The result will be better safety information about new therapies and enhanced future drug development overall. Looking forward, ePROs can become a cornerstone of evaluating cancer treatment. This technology will be essential to improve the experience of patients who do the important work of giving their time to clinical research to improve many lives beyond their own.

Melissa Mooney, Director, eCOA Solutions Engineering, IQVIA


Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
© putilov_denis - © putilov_denis - stock.adobe.com
Real-time clinical trials require standardized digital data capture at the point of care through scaled eSource-EDC-EHR integration, but progress stalls because competing standards lack regulatory enforcement and one-off system integrations cannot scale beyond single studies without industry-wide alignment and legal clarity on data ownership.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.