FDA & Industry Share Perspectives on Patient Centricity
As patient centricity continues to evolve, the differences in perspective between sponsors and the FDA over how to define this concept run parallel. With rising awareness will come the need for a definitive model that incorporates patient centricity in drug development.
When I chaired
Industry Initiatives on Patient Centricity
The impression I got from the industry is that they have taken a leap to involve patients in clinical trials. For example, some sponsors are engaging patients through panels in order to optimize study design (i.e., ways to reduce patient burden and how to make the study simpler for patients), optimize inclusion/exclusion criteria, and understand the targeted patient population in order to establish safety and efficacy parameters during data collection. Other sponsors have demonstrated case studies on evaluating medical product value through
FDA Initiatives on Patient Centricity
The FDA recently launched The Patient Preference Initiative, and the Patient Engagement Advisory Committee in medical device development. These initiatives focus on incorporating the patient’s perspective during a medical product’s Total Product Lifecycle. Specifically, incorporating the patient’s preferences in defining clinically meaningful outcomes.
FDA’s Stand: What is Patient Centricity Supposed to Be About?
When a representative from the FDA spoke at the conference, they expressed a different viewpoint on patient centricity. Specifically, the representative seemed to emphasize that patient centricity is not necessarily about focusing on patient engagement initiatives, but, rather on interacting with patients to define clinically meaningful outcomes before study design. To elaborate, many medical directors (who typically tend to be physicians) oftentimes have very different mindsets on what they believe are clinically meaningful outcomes compared to patients. For example, a case study was presented where a comparative assessment on clinical outcomes was conducted between physicians and patients for anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation; patients viewed ‘disabling stroke’ as a major clinical outcome, whereas physicians perceived ‘death’ as a major clinical outcome. The representative indicated that patients need to be treated as colleagues throughout the drug development process.
Where is the Disconnect?
Table 1 delineates my interpretation of the differences in perspectives between Sponsors and the FDA on Patient Centricity.
Table 1 suggests that the biopharmaceutical industry is perceiving patient centricity as patient engagement, whereas the FDA’s perspective is focused on developing clinically meaningful outcomes, and incorporating the patient’s perspective throughout the clinical trial process.
Summary
In summary, while the concept of patient centricity is cementing, the differences in perspectives between sponsors and the FDA about the definition of patient centricity are moving in parallel, but, not in tandem. While the FDA has no guidance document on patient centricity, it is likely that sponsors and the FDA will find a model and process that consistently defines and incorporates patient centricity in drug development.
Newsletter
Stay current in clinical research with Applied Clinical Trials, providing expert insights, regulatory updates, and practical strategies for successful clinical trial design and execution.
Related Articles
- Ensuring Digital Trial Platforms Work for Underserved Communities
September 10th 2025
- How Sponsors Can Modernize Tools to Support Physicians
September 9th 2025
- Using AI Trial-Matching Tools to Accelerate Patient Access
September 8th 2025
- Addressing the Digital Divide in Decentralized Trials
August 28th 2025