Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
|Articles|October 1, 2015

Guido Rasi Enjoys Surprise Reincarnation at EMA

Author(s)Philip Ward

Rasi was forced to step down in November 2014 by the EU Civil Service Tribunal after a panel of experts found the European Commission (EC) had used improper procedures when it had selected him back in 2011.

In a remarkable turnaround, the management board of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has nominated Prof. Guido Rasi as the agency’s new executive director, less than 12 months after he had to leave the job.


On October 13, Rasi is expected to make a statement to the European Parliament’s Committee on the Environment. The appointment of the new executive director is likely to be made after this session.

Rasi was forced to step down in November 2014 by the EU Civil Service Tribunal after a panel of experts found the European Commission (EC) had used improper procedures when it had selected him back in 2011.

Emil Hristov, who was formerly a member of the Bulgarian Drug Agency and EMA board, submitted the case against Rasi. It was found that the EC had improperly put together a short list of candidates for the position of EMA executive director, following the departure of former leader Thomas Lönngren in 2010.

Following Rasi’s nomination, the chair of the management board, Prof. Sir Kent Woods said the decision of the management board is the result of a robust recruitment process over the last months. “We look forward to Professor Rasi resuming his leadership of the Agency,” Woods pointed out.

Deputy Executive Director Andreas Pott will continue to lead EMA operations and to legally represent the agency until the new executive director has officially taken up his duties.

“I am honored to have been nominated as EMA’s Executive Director and am grateful for the opportunity to continue our efforts to make the Agency fit for the challenges ahead. I am enormously proud of the Agency and its network,” noted Rasi in a statement. “Looking to the future, we must continue to meet patients’ legitimate expectations for access to new and safe therapeutic options. This requires that the medicines authorization process not only supports the early stages of research and development, but also strives to make the best possible use of real world data throughout a medicine’s lifecycle.”
 

Read the full release.


Related to this article

Closing the Community Access Gap: Q&A with Kent Thoelke, Paradigm Health
In this Q&A, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, discusses why participation gaps in community and rural settings come down to both patient cost barriers and site infrastructure, how legacy workflows weigh on community clinics, and what policy and technology changes it would take to make clinical research a real care option for more patients.
© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.