In this video interview, Craig Lipset, co-chair, Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance (DTRA), shares his thoughts on the recent funding cuts made by the NIH and how they are impacting medical research.
In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Craig Lipset, co-chair, Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance (DTRA), discussed the impact of recent regulatory decisions on clinical research. Funding cuts by the NIH will affect intramural research and shared infrastructure. Additionally, the politicization of diversity initiatives will affect the enforcement of action plans. Lipset also highlighted the industry’s response to these actions and what it can expect moving forward.
ACT: What was your initial reaction to some of the most recent regulatory decisions impacted by the federal government such as NIH funding cuts and the FDA removing its diversity webpages?
Lipset: Clearly, this is a very polarizing time politically for a lot of folks, but I think objectively, most would say that efficiencies are needed, and that would be a good thing. We want our public research dollars to make the greatest possible impact, but it does feel like many of the actions to date have been, the visual is more chainsaws than scalpels. We see things being targeted, like the role of overhead with NIH funding of academic research and that seems like an easy target just to go after, but it has tremendous consequences. Overhead in academic research supported by the NIH supports intramural research, those research initiatives that are being funded by the universities themselves, that often provide the seeding of what future research we want to go after, those are often the higher risk, smaller things to go after. Overhead supports our shared infrastructure, our labs, our technical equipment, and other shared resources that you couldn't put as a line item into just one direct budget, one set of direct costs for a grant, so there's tremendous consequences, and it is painful for many of us to see that ripple effect in terms of PhD acceptances being rescinded for a next generation of research scientists, and certainly for a lot of the staffing and resourcing, even just within the FDA and the NIH.
Funding Cuts Threaten Diversity in Clinical Research
June 27th 2025In this video interview, Kyle McAllister, co-founder, CEO, Trially, discusses how recent federal funding cuts are likely to undermine research focused on underrepresented populations, and why long-term investment in community-based studies is essential to closing persistent health equity gaps.
Unifying Industry to Better Understand GCP Guidance
May 7th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, David Nickerson, head of clinical quality management at EMD Serono; and Arlene Lee, director of product management, data quality & risk management solutions at Medidata, discuss the newest ICH E6(R3) GCP guidelines as well as how TransCelerate and ACRO have partnered to help stakeholders better acclimate to these guidelines.
2025 DIA Annual Meeting: Why AI and Automation Are Set to Become the New Normal in Clinical Research
June 20th 2025Peter Ronco, CEO, Emmes, shares his long-term vision for artificial intelligence in clinical research, from making automation routine to improving drug discovery, transforming regulatory oversight, reducing animal testing, and promoting ethical, equitable data use worldwide.
FDA to Launch National Priority Voucher Program to Speed Drug Reviews for Critical Therapies
June 18th 2025Under the new initiative, companies may receive a voucher enabling FDA review to be shortened from the standard 10–12 months to just 1–2 months following final application submission if the drug addresses US national health priorities.