Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|December 11, 2024

Industry Perceptions of Decentralized Clinical Trials

In this video interview, Jane Myles, program director, Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance (DTRA), discusses how some stakeholders view DCTs only as fully remote trials.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Jane Myles, program director, Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance (DTRA), discussed trends and challenges in decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) including misconceptions and the rapid adoption of DCT elements. Myles also highlighted DTRA's initiatives on site adoption, operational planning, and the integration of digital health technologies.

ACT: What are some trends and challenges you’re currently seeing with decentralized clinical trials (DCTs)?

Myles: I would say that maybe people are a little bit allergic to the term DCT, which doesn't mean they're not using DCT elements. What I mean by that is there are a lot of people who hear DCT and react just to the acronym, and many of them are potentially thinking DCT means fully remote, which, as we know, it doesn't. When they hear DCT, it conjures up these concepts of site-less trials and fully virtual and nobody ever sees a doctor, and we know now that is not the case for the vast majority of trials where DCT elements are used. It's even reflective of how the FDA guidance on DCTs changed from draft to final form. The terminology DCT is an allergen, but the adoption is actually going pretty quickly. I would say, realistically, there's still challenges implementing DCT elements across different regions of the world, just because they need to look like the actual processes are a little bit different in different places, but I wouldn't say that it's because there's a technology gap, or even a will to use gap in any one region.


Related to this article

Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Why Fuzzy Mental Models Undermine Clinical Trial Execution
In Episode 3 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, hosts Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., and Kelly Ritch, chief operating officer of ArcheMedX, Inc., speak with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about why a well-written protocol doesn’t always translate into consistent execution, and how designing for the way people actually think and learn can reduce site burden and the need for costly unlearning.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.