Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|March 4, 2025

Making Clinical Trials More Accessible in Light of Recent FDA, NIH Policy Changes

In this video interview, Iddo Peleg, CEO and co-founder at Yonalink, shares his thoughts on the current climate of clinical research following NIH funding cuts and the removal of FDA diversity guidelines.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Iddo Peleg, CEO and co-founder at Yonalink, discussed the impact of recent FDA and NIH actions on clinical trials. With changes in funding and DEI initiatives, there is a need to make trials more accessible for patients. Peleg highlighted how advancements in technology could address this, not only increasing accessibility, but efficiency as well.

ACT: What was your initial reaction to the FDA removing its diversity webpages and the recent NIH funding cuts?

Peleg: When we're looking at clinical trials and when we want to think about if things that have been done are right or wrong, we need to look at the big picture. The number of clinical trials that were done in 2024, it's similar, or even less than in 2019. This means that in five years we didn't have any market growth, which is quite weird, and we need to find out why. We had some jump during COVID, but this is not the reality, the pandemic, when we talk about year-to-year growth. We need to think, what is the reason that we do not see growth in the clinical trial market, that there is a different reason for that. I think one of the things that's very important is to think if we had all types of roadblocks, something that prevented from the market to growth, and to shift the efforts of the FDA, of the NIH, to the right things in order to generate growth of the market, to make more clinical trials, to bring more new therapies to the patients. I think the aim is, when we are thinking about what the best approach is, is eventually to make clinical trials accessible to any patient, anywhere in the United States, so definitely we need to change things. All the changes, I think we need to make them, to make sure that all of them are with the aim to generate more clinical trials, to bring more therapies to the market faster, and to make clinical trials accessible to any patient anywhere.


Related to this article

© putilov_denis - © putilov_denis - stock.adobe.com
Real-time clinical trials require standardized digital data capture at the point of care through scaled eSource-EDC-EHR integration, but progress stalls because competing standards lack regulatory enforcement and one-off system integrations cannot scale beyond single studies without industry-wide alignment and legal clarity on data ownership.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.