COVID-19 physical distancing requirements forced change in how traditional clinical trials were conducted and a new Informa Pharma and Oracle study shows the industry is not looking back. Of the 251 people surveyed, 84% implemented alternative tactics to continue their existing clinical trials and/or start new trials during the pandemic. Of those respondents, 82% said these approaches had positively impacted their clinical trials overall. Looking to the future, 97% indicated their organization would continue using at least one of these new methods moving forward, leading with remote monitoring and video (eHealth) visits.
The survey, Clinical Trial Management in a Post-Pandemic World, polled participants from biopharmaceutical and medical device companies, as well as CROs involved in the operations and management of clinical trials from July to September 2021. Respondents, who were largely from North America and Europe, with others from APAC and other regions, were asked about changes made to their clinical trials during the pandemic, the effect of these adaptations, and the impact of these changes on the future of clinical trials.
Of the various methods noted, 45% of respondents said they had adopted remote monitoring in their trials during the pandemic, nearly doubling the number of respondents who reported using remote monitoring a year ago. Among the newly adopted methods that companies plan to continue to use post-pandemic, remote monitoring (32%), video visits (28%), electronic health records (24%), and phone visits led the pack (24%).
The most common positive impacts of the alternative approaches adopted during the pandemic included more timely data access (48%), improved flexibility for patients (41%), and increased speed (38%).
When asked about their confidence in the data generated by newly adopted approaches, 92% of respondents stated they were equally or more confident in the data collected from these methods, compared to data collected via pre-pandemic methods. This was a marked change from the 2020 survey when nearly half of respondents said that data reliability and quality (50%) and data collection (45%) were key concerns in adopting decentralized clinical trials. This significant increase in confidence supports the industry’s continued progress towards more decentralized models.
The study also found that improving the patient experience is a priority. Many respondents (61%) believe allowing patients’ choice will have a positive impact on clinical research and well over half (58%) said that their organizations plan to give patients the option to choose how they participate in clinical trials moving forward.
As the shift to decentralized trials continues, survey respondents expect their organizations to continue using hybrid (44%) and fit-for-purpose (42%) models after the pandemic. Of the four models considered—site-based, fit-for-purpose, hybrid, and decentralized—respondents expect the use of the site-based model to decrease the most (24%).
AI in Clinical Trials: A Long, But Promising Road Ahead
May 29th 2024Stephen Pyke, chief clinical data and digital officer, Parexel, discusses how AI can be used in clinical trials to streamline operational processes, the importance of collaboration and data sharing in advancing the use of technology, and more.
Including Women of Childbearing Age in Clinical Research
March 26th 2024In recognition of International Women's Month, we're featuring this recent talk between Associate Editor Miranda Schmalfuhs and Marie Teil, Global Head of UCB’s Women of Childbearing Age Program. They speak about the specific challenges women with chronic illnesses face when accessing appropriate treatment and participating in clinical trials, UCB's Women of Childbearing Age Program and it’s most successful strategies, and much more.
Ethical, Biosafety, and Scientific Review Considerations in Hematology and Oncology Clinical Trials
September 10th 2024The current oncology and hematology drug development pipeline features a wide array of large molecule therapeutics. As a result, clinical trial protocols have grown more complex, requiring sponsors, CROs, and research sites to tackle a variety of challenges that were less common with older, more traditional therapies.