PAREXEL Consulting Releases New White Paper on FDA's Drug Review Process
Today
- How has the increased safety scrutiny at FDA affected new drug review times and outcome patterns?
- If first-cycle NDA approval rates have steadied, why have approval rates for priority NDAs stumbled recently?
- Pending NDAs surged over the last year, but have NME submissions as well?
“The implications of FDAAA and CDER’s implementation of the law have been widely discussed, and there is considerable conjecture in the biopharmaceutical industry regarding how FDA review timelines and the approval process are being impacted by new requirements, such as REMS," said Mark Mathieu, Director of Strategic Research at PAREXEL Consulting and the study’s lead author. "What our research provides is a real-world, metrics-based assessment to help inform expectations of new drug review outcomes in the Safety First Era."
That assessment also includes discussions on real-world implications of overdue NDA reviews on first-cycle approval rates and why priority-rated drugs continue to have advantages in the drug review process, despite their decline.
To find out more, the white paper is available for down load
Newsletter
Stay current in clinical research with Applied Clinical Trials, providing expert insights, regulatory updates, and practical strategies for successful clinical trial design and execution.
Related Articles
- Everything to Know About FDA’s Push Towards Radical Transparency in 2025
September 17th 2025
- IQVIA and Veeva Join Forces to Improve Efficiency and Patient Outcomes
September 17th 2025
- Managing Background Therapies in the NIMBLE Phase III Trial
September 17th 2025
- Generative AI Transforms Clinical Study Report Development
September 16th 2025