Aardvark released exploratory data from its stopped Phase 3 HERO trial in Prader-Willi syndrome after FDA lifted the hold, and plans a redesigned Phase 3.
|Articles|July 21, 2015
PAREXEL Launches Next Generation Analytics Capabilities Within Perceptive MyTrials Platform
Author(s)Company Press Release
Advertisement
BOSTON, MA, July 21, 2015 - PAREXEL International Corporation (NASDAQ: PRXL), a leading global biopharmaceutical services provider, today launched the next generation of its Perceptive MyTrials® platform with advanced analytics capabilities. With the Perceptive MyTrials Analytics solution, clinical trial sponsors can now use a mobile-enabled, single entry-point to access predictive data analytics for multiple studies simultaneously. The solution offers real-time and aggregated analytics allowing sponsors and PAREXEL® clinical research professionals to detect key signals and trends. The Perceptive MyTrials Analytics solution also offers cross-sponsor viewing options for clients who need to evaluate data from multiple sponsors.
“As clinical studies become more complex, there is a growing need for real-time and standardized data and analytics from multiple studies,” said Xavier Flinois, President, PAREXEL Informatics. “Using the enhanced tools available with the Perceptive MyTrials Analytics solution, our clients can visualize trends across studies, garner reliable intelligence, and confidently make
Developed by PAREXEL Informatics, the Perceptive MyTrials® platform provides an integrated suite of applications for managing clinical trials. Perceptive MyTrials Analytics offers enhanced analytics capabilities and cross-study business intelligence from within the Perceptive MyTrials platform.
Flinois added, “At PAREXEL, our mission is to bring science to the real world by simplifying a client’s journey at every step. Perceptive MyTrials Analytics is another example of the integrated solutions we are developing that incorporate optimized
Advertisement
Related to this article
Clinical trials capture data faster than ever, but the real bottleneck is the distance between data capture and a decision teams can trust.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why the future of AI in trials is a trusted orchestration system rather than a single model, how coordinators rate eSource-enabled workflows, and what a bipartisan bill proposes for reusable trial networks.
The Faster Clinical Trials Act would create an FDA Center for Clinical Trial Innovation and aims to cut trial costs and enrollment time by at least 30%.
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine how sites can avoid both fear-driven and overly aggressive AI adoption, why community-based research needs sustained financial investment, and why patient access matters more than organizational size.
Pacing obesity trial enrollment, anchoring eligibility to stable real-world therapies, and building site and physician relationships improve retention and data quality more than aggressive recruitment or restrictive exclusion criteria do.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
2
Clinical Trials Do Not Have a Data Problem, They Have a Decision-Readiness Problem
3
ACT Brief: Orchestrated AI Clinical Environments, eSource Coordinator Satisfaction, and Faster Clinical Trials Act
4
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
5