The Faster Clinical Trials Act would create an FDA Center for Clinical Trial Innovation and aims to cut trial costs and enrollment time by at least 30%.
|Articles|October 3, 2011
Pearl Pathways to Parent Pearl IRB and Two New Sister Companies
Advertisement
Pearl IRB remains focused on expediting the clinical research process, by offering several wrap around services including medical writing, on demand clinical research staffing, research process and regulatory training, in addition to its core IRB Board Review services. Two branches will be added to the Pearl family–Pearl ReGXP and Pearl IDEAS. Pearl ReGXP accelerates global product registrations and approvals, and supports clients’ quality compliance initiatives with a team of regulatory compliance experts. Serving startups and small service providers, Pearl IDEAS is a boutique consulting group focused on turning ideas and inventions into life science solutions.
“Our clients shaped the direction of our future growth. We listened to the needs of existing and potential clients, and developed a family of businesses to support the regulatory and product development challenges facing bio-pharma and device companies of all sizes,” shares Diana Caldwell, President and CEO of Pearl Pathways.
According to
and more. Our mix of business units allows us to provide that expertise,” states Gretchen Bowker, COO of Pearl Pathways.
Caldwell says the expansion should create 20 additional positions over the next two years.
Advertisement
Related to this article
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine how sites can avoid both fear-driven and overly aggressive AI adoption, why community-based research needs sustained financial investment, and why patient access matters more than organizational size.
Pacing obesity trial enrollment, anchoring eligibility to stable real-world therapies, and building site and physician relationships improve retention and data quality more than aggressive recruitment or restrictive exclusion criteria do.
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Syneos Health and Optum outline a joint model for trial planning, recruitment and site access, with no financial terms or timelines disclosed.
AstraZeneca and Oracle Outline AI Collaboration for Clinical Trial Recruitment and Safety Monitoring
What sponsors and sites should know about the AstraZeneca-Oracle AI collaboration on trial recruitment, safety monitoring and data governance.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
2
Building Standardized Evidence for eSource-Enabled Clinical Trials: Multi-Site Validation of a Clinical Research Coordinator Satisfaction Methodology
3
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
4
Syneos Health, Optum Partner on Adaptive Clinical Development Model
5