Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
|Articles|April 13, 2023

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-04-01-2023
  • Volume 32
  • Issue 4

Pharmacovigilance vs. Drug Safety

Identifying key differences between PV and drug safety.

Often the question, “what is the difference between pharmacovigilance and drug safety?” comes up around both our Pharmaceutical Executive and Applied Clinical Trials content. Here, I offer a comparison definition taken from a slide deck from our friends at PhysIQ:

Pharmacovigilance is the science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or any other medicine/vaccine related problem. It is proactive, and focused on signal interpretation.

Drug safety refers to the frequency of adverse drug effects (ie., physical or laboratory toxicity that could possibly be related to the drug) that are treatment-emergent. That is, they emerge during treatment and were not present before it, or they become worse during treatment compared with the pre-treatment state. It is reactive and focused on compliance reporting.

In this recent Applied Clinical Trials podcast, Beth MacEntee Pileggi, head of global case and safety data management with Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and co-lead of TransCelerate BioPharma’s Pharmacovigilance Agreements Optimization Initiative, explained that 20 to 30 years ago, the role was called drug safety. But the therapeutic landscape has changed drastically; increasing regulatory requirements and new novel medicinal products—and not just the compounds, but also with delivery systems and multiple combination products.

“All of this adds layers of complexity,” said Pileggi. “Pharmacovigilance brings in other aspects of managing a drug’s risk profile, so it’s not just about the benefits, but also about the risks.”

Drug safety in clinical trials, however, remains its own regulatory segment, though both clinical and commercial teams may work together, depending on the pharma company.

At the same time, there is a computing/analytics movement within the PV space to create opportunities within the actual PV function or externally. For example, Pileggi notes that internally is a better way to receive, process, manage, evaluate, and monitor the multitude of incoming PV data to evaluate and aggregate insights.

Externally, many are looking at the trove of PV data to inform real-world evidence, clinical trial design, drug discovery, and improve clinical care or interventions of same, plus many more. Drug safety is not just a regulatory obligation; it now has the potential to change the world of therapeutics and clinical care for more positive patient outcomes.

Related to this article

Closing the Community Access Gap: Q&A with Kent Thoelke, Paradigm Health
In this Q&A, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, discusses why participation gaps in community and rural settings come down to both patient cost barriers and site infrastructure, how legacy workflows weigh on community clinics, and what policy and technology changes it would take to make clinical research a real care option for more patients.
© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.