Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
|Articles|December 5, 2016

Pinpointing Phase III Trials in Emerging Countries

Most clinical trial activity for Phase III trials takes place in the traditional North American and European markets.

Phase III patient enrollment represents one of the most critical business issues facing the pharmaceutical industry. In recent years there has been extensive discussion about the growing use of newer geographies for Phase III clinical study sites. Many of these newer geographies in areas such as Asia, South Asia, Latin America and Africa may represent increasingly attractive commercial markets for pharmaceutical companies. But more critically for drug development professionals, these areas present the prospect of large pools of medially naïve patients who can be enrolled at quicker rates and at lower costs. At many conferences speakers, particularly from larger pharmaceutical companies and CROs discuss the opportunities and challenges for clinical trial completion represented by these new geographies.  

Clinical site selection is primarily driven by that site’s ability to enroll and tread patients in accord with the study protocol. Certainly though a market’s commercial attractiveness may also be a consideration. Larger pharmaceutical companies are probably better equipped to launch drugs in the newer geographies. The data from the federally mandated fields in ClinicalTrials.gov do show that the very largest pharmaceutical companies are more likely to conduct clinical trials outside the traditional geographies of North America. But like the rest of the industry, most of the clinical trial activity remains within North America and Europe. Moreover, there has been no appreciable increase in the use of newer geographies by either larger or smaller companies.

Harold E. Glass, PhD, Dean's Professor, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia


Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.