Commentary|Videos|February 5, 2025

SCOPE Summit 2025: Veeva’s Drew Garty Discusses Pragmatic Clinical Trials

In an interview with ACT senior editor Andy Studna at SCOPE Summit, Garty, chief technology officer, clinical data, provided his key takeaways from a panel he participated in on the growing interest around pragmatic studies.

ACT: What are some of your key takeaways from the panel you participated in on pragmatic trials?

Garty: Going in, pragmatic trials really talk about the delta that we have, I think, between the traditional clinical research that we have in the real world, and there's a gap that when you go through that you prove efficacy in a controlled environment, that doesn't actually mean that you are set up for success in the real world. There's a lot of policy that actually has to be changed in terms of recommendations of which therapies to treat with, so we need to bring in if we want to close the gap between when a Phase III trial ends and hospitals start administering the use of the products, we actually have to close that gap down. In a way, pragmatic trials are then feeding upstream into Phase III trials and giving us the ability to simplify and standardize what we do. A good example of reducing the costs and complexities of protocols, decreasing the amount of procedures a patient might have to endure, and even where they are in the world. All of those things can be addressed with what we have in terms of tools and capabilities, but we need to focus as an industry.


Related to this article

What the Epilepsy Community Has Taught Us About Trial Feasibility
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, shares what she has learned firsthand from families living with Dravet syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder about what makes trial participation possible—and what makes it not.
Why Seizure Counts Alone Can't Define Success in Epilepsy Trials
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why the full burden of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies extends far beyond clinical symptoms—and why endpoints must reflect what families are actually hoping for.
What It Actually Means to Embed the Patient Voice in Trial Design
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why genuine patient partnership begins before the protocol is written—and what it looks like when patients and caregivers tell you a trial was designed with them in mind.
What This Study Means for Sponsors Still Struggling to Justify RBQM at Scale
In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how ICH E6(R3) and new empirical evidence of RBQM's net financial impact give sponsors the tools they need to build the multi-functional buy-in required for successful adoption—and why RBQM only delivers full value when it replaces, not supplements, traditional monitoring.