BOSTON, MA - Resources dedicated to creating medicines to meet the unique needs of children have grown steadily since legislation guiding pediatric drug development was enacted in the United States two decades ago, and the outlook for still greater development looks promising, according to a new analysis completed by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.
Even though R&D complexity has grown more than 50% since 2008, resources dedicated to pediatric studies have increased across most R&D functions, according to the new Tufts CSDD study, which updates a similar assessment it completed nearly a decade ago.
"Much has changed since 2007, including the need to conduct pediatric studies earlier in development across all age groups, with appropriate formulations, in the context of a changing, more complex research environment," noted Christopher-Paul Milne, research associate professor and director of research at Tufts CSDD at Tufts University School of Medicine, who conducted the analysis.
Since the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) and the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) were enacted in 2002 and 2003, respectively, more than 600 drugs and biologicals originally developed for adults have been labeled in the U.S. with specific information to inform safer administration and dosing in children.
"Developing formulations for children was not achieved easily and remains a costly and complex undertaking," said Milne.
He noted that pediatric R&D today must account for expanded data requirements and changes imposed by advances in pharmacogenomics, regulatory science, and multi-country clinical trial networks.
Key findings from the analysis, based on a survey sent to more than two dozen drug development companies, reported in the November/December Tufts CSDD Impact Report and released today, include the following:
Pediatric regulatory science holds the most promise for improving the reliability of pediatric drug development, even as patient recruitment problems persist.
The drug development environment for pediatric rare diseases continues to move "in the right direction," but including neonates in routine drug development will likely remain challenging in the near term.
Patient recruitment and retention as well as modifications/amendments to study plans after study start are the top factors pushing up development costs.
About the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development
The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development at Tufts University provides strategic information to help drug developers, regulators, and policy makers improve the quality and efficiency of pharmaceutical development, review, and utilization. Tufts CSDD, based in Boston, conducts a wide range of in-depth analyses on pharmaceutical issues and hosts symposia, workshops, and public forums, and publishes Tufts CSDD Impact Reports, a bi-monthly newsletter providing analysis and insight into critical drug development issues.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
VERITAC-2 Trial Shows Vepdegestrant Significantly Improves Survival in ESR1-Mutant Breast Cancer
March 24th 2025Phase III VERITAC-2 trial results show vepdegestrant significantly improved progression-free survivalcompared to fulvestrant in patients with ESR1-mutant (ESR1m) advanced or metastatic breast cancer, but did not achieve statistical significance in the overall intent-to-treat population.
Reaching Diverse Patient Populations With Personalized Treatment Methods
January 20th 2025Daejin Abidoye, head of solid tumors, oncology development, AbbVie, discusses a number of topics around diversity in clinical research including industry’s greatest challenges in reaching diverse patient populations, personalized treatment methods, recruitment strategies, and more.