Tufts CSDD Site Experience Survey
The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (Tufts CSDD) is conducting a study on investigative site perspectives and burden associated with Direct-to-Patient (DTP) shipment of study treatments and supplies.
Researchers at Tufts CSDD at the Tufts University School of Medicine, in collaboration with Global Clinical Supplies Group (GCSG), a professional organization of global clinical supplies professionals, are conducting an academic survey to increase understanding of investigative site personnel experiences with the shipment of Investigational Products/Study Treatments to trial participants at their homes—also known as Direct-to-Patient (DtP) shipments of study drug. Your feedback is invaluable in helping to identify pain points and improvement areas.
Please take a few minutes to take survey. In appreciation for your participation, the Tufts CSDD research team will share with you a summary of results when the research concludes. Start the survey: https://tufts.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2bm7lW1vt6zl53g
Thank you in advance for your participation in this important research effort!
Putting Collective Insights Into Action to Advance Cancer Care: Key Examples From ASCO 2025
June 27th 2025At ASCO 2025, clinical operations leaders gained critical insights into how AI tools, bispecific antibodies, and evolving treatment paradigms are reshaping trial design, endpoint selection, and patient stratification.
Unifying Industry to Better Understand GCP Guidance
May 7th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, David Nickerson, head of clinical quality management at EMD Serono; and Arlene Lee, director of product management, data quality & risk management solutions at Medidata, discuss the newest ICH E6(R3) GCP guidelines as well as how TransCelerate and ACRO have partnered to help stakeholders better acclimate to these guidelines.
Funding Cuts Threaten Diversity in Clinical Research
June 27th 2025In this video interview, Kyle McAllister, co-founder, CEO, Trially, discusses how recent federal funding cuts are likely to undermine research focused on underrepresented populations, and why long-term investment in community-based studies is essential to closing persistent health equity gaps.
