Use of Televisits in Studies and Related PV Concerns
Applied Clinical Trials
While televisits can address many medical concerns, one frequent reservation expressed by healthcare professionals is that patients during these televisits tend to present too narrow a picture of their clinical condition-resulting in non-comprehensive medical assessments.
The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a surge of attention and tremendous increase of use of televisits (also called tele-consultation or, more technically, real-time synchronous telehealth) over a very short period of time. As an example, in France the traditional weekly frequency of televisits observed before March 2020 has been multiplied by 50 in a couple of weeks, and many physicians usually reluctant with this virtual consultation eventually adopted it, at least transitorily. Televisits are now becoming strongly considered for the management of studies as an essential alternative to on-site face-to-face visits during the pandemic, but also as a new approach for the development of virtual decentralized trials or hybrid patient follow-up within a study.
The EUCROF PharmacoVigilance Working Group discussed the potential impact of televisits on pharmacovigilance (PV) processes and related guidance to be given to all stakeholders.
The main concerns identified relate to the qualitative and quantitative impact of televisits on the ability of treating physicians to detect some adverse events (AEs) and thus might compromise the safety of patients.
While televisits can address many medical concerns, one frequent reservation expressed by healthcare professionals, especially in primary care, is that patients during these televisits tend to present a too narrow picture of their clinical condition, resulting in non-comprehensive and risky medical assessments that in routine practice, physicians and patients are not familiar with. Furthermore, subtle, alerting signs spontaneously arising from the simple observation of the patient during the consultation are unlikely to be detected through a videoconference or telephone visit, given technology limitations and respective behaviors during such remote consultations. Examples include: general attitude of the patients, their posture, the way they spontaneously walk, stand up, or move, their skin coloration, thoracic appearance during breathing, routine lymph node palpation, etc. This may impair early detection of some AEs.
Therefore, we recommend pharmacovigilance and medical teams:
- Perform a risk-analysis on what signs and symptoms the physician is likely to miss given the specificities of televisits.
- Based on RMP, SmPC, product characteristics and/or drug class safety profile, combined with type of medical practice, identify safety concerns of interest and is- sue appropriate recommendations for a targeted screening for these safety concerns during the televisit.
- Similar to the procedure followed for COVID-19 televisits, standardized questions/ requirements/examples can be listed on a checklist form/examination protocol.
Xavier Fournie is an Executive Medical Director at ICON. Zurab Koberidze is a Director at FGK. Nicolas Tsiakkas is a Scientific Director at Medwork. Marco Anelli, MD is the Data, Information, Knowledge & Intelligence Group Leader at ProductLife Group.
FDA Approves Nipocalimab for the Treatment of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
April 30th 2025Approval is based on results from the pivotal Vivacity-MG3 trial in which IMAAVY (nipocalimab-aahu) demonstrated superior disease control throughout 24 weeks when compared to placebo plus standard of care.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
