Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
Commentary|Videos|January 17, 2025

2025 Trends: Leveraging Data Standards

In this video interview, Kimberly Tableman, founder & CEO, ESPERO, highlights how data standards are empowering the use of artificial intelligence.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Kimberly Tableman, founder & CEO, ESPERO, discussed the challenges and trends in protocol development for clinical trials. She also highlighted technological advancements, such as data interoperability standards like ICH M11 and CDISC, and how they are expected to streamline protocol development and support generative AI in 2025.

ACT: What do you think should be top of mind for clinical operations executives going in 2025?

Tableman: I think there's a number of different things, but I think the data interoperability part that I just spoke of, and leveraging the standards, again, from the ICH M11 all the way through enabling that digital data flow, but what it really empowers again, is artificial intelligence. We are seeing the use of AI, and we talk a lot right now about artificial intelligence with a human in the loop, so I think for where we're at right now in pharma, I think that clinical operations executives need to be looking at it, but I think also realizing that we're not yet at the advent where artificial intelligence is taking away jobs and so on and so forth, you still need people that are looking at what the AI generates and saying, “Yeah, this works, or it doesn't work.” For us, for example, we use artificial intelligence to bring in a bolus of objectives, endpoints, inclusion/exclusion, criteria, that are options that you can put into the protocol, but a human being is still looking at that information and making a decision about, “Yeah, I want to leverage this objective or this endpoint, I want to put in this inclusion or exclusion into the study design overall.” I think getting comfortable with a trust but verify, taking some steps in that direction, to start getting more comfortable with artificial intelligence will be really helpful.


Related to this article

Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.
© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.