
The Reality of Operational Flexibility for Trial Sites
In this video interview, Caroline Potts, general manager of sites and patient services at Medical Research Network (MRN), discusses the challenges of achieving true operational flexibility in clinical trials—highlighting how SOPs, staffing, and budget constraints often limit site adaptability and contribute to staff burnout.
In a recent video interview Applied Clinical Trials,
ACT: What does operational flexibility really look like for sites today? How can it be implemented without adding to staff burnout?
Potts: I think the key point there is the staff burnout. I think everyone likes to genuinely believe that operational flexibility exists, and I'm just not sure that that is the true lived experience of site staff. I think that everyone wants to do a good job, everyone wants to be able to offer solutions that perhaps are nonstandard, or seen as nonstandard, but SOPs, budgetary constraints, time constraints, availability of staff, availability of patients, all of those things can—more often than not—count against this idea of having the flexibility. I think that it does run the risk of leading to staff burnout as a result of that, unfortunately. It's a great concept, and I think everyone should still continue to try to strive for it, but I think the reality is a little bit different to that.
Newsletter
Stay current in clinical research with Applied Clinical Trials, providing expert insights, regulatory updates, and practical strategies for successful clinical trial design and execution.