Commentary|Articles|November 19, 2024

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-11-01-2024
  • Volume 33
  • Issue 11

Advancing for Patients

This November issue of ACT explores those technological innovations in clinical trial recruitment and data collection and management that are being geared toward empowering the research community's most important asset—the patient.

A popular topic of discussion in clinical research in recent years has been giving more power to the patient. In the current landscape of complex trials and a plethora of technology solutions available, it is important for us to maintain focus on our most important stakeholders—patients. While technology has streamlined many operational aspects of clinical trials, it is also being leveraged to access more potential participants.

At the most recent DPHARM conference, Applied Clinical Trials spoke with Jill Pellegrino, CEO of AutoCruitment. She gave an example of how clinical technology is now being applied to patient recruitment. “We can collect their (patients’) medical records very easily for them, and then we have AI-powered technology that reviews those records and organizes that data and assesses it to see if they're eligible for the protocols,” she said.

This November issue of ACT explores innovations such as those and how they are empowering patients.

The series of feature articles begins with a use case in a hospital setting on how artificial intelligence can be leveraged in patient recruitment with the hope of boosting enrollment. There is great potential in harnessing unstructured patient data, which can aid in meeting critical recruitment metrics. Following is a piece on the principle of net treatment benefit (NTB). NTB empowers patients to play a more active role in their treatment journey by offering transparency and personalization in the evaluation of treatment effects.

We also present an article exploring recent trends in patient recruitment advertising. It includes metrics and data from the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. Rounding out our November feature coverage is a piece on the complexities of timely data collection.

Also in this issue, we are happy to introduce a new column to our usual slate. Authored by long-time ACT contributor Hugo Stephenson, MD, co-founder and executive chair, TrialScreen, the column will highlight current trends in trial engagement. In his first installment, Stephenson explores the importance of weighing data and trust equally in patient recruitment and retention strategies.

As always, thanks for reading.

Mike Hennessy Jr is president and CEO of MJH Life Sciences®


Related to this article

© C Davids/peopleimages.com - © C Davids/peopleimages.com - stock.adobe.com
The clinical research industry talks about patient-centeredness constantly but embeds it too late, too narrowly, and without clear ownership, and the cost shows up in enrollment failures, protocol deviations, and outcomes that don't reflect what patients actually care about.
What the Epilepsy Community Has Taught Us About Trial Feasibility
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, shares what she has learned firsthand from families living with Dravet syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder about what makes trial participation possible—and what makes it not.
Why Seizure Counts Alone Can't Define Success in Epilepsy Trials
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why the full burden of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies extends far beyond clinical symptoms—and why endpoints must reflect what families are actually hoping for.
What It Actually Means to Embed the Patient Voice in Trial Design
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why genuine patient partnership begins before the protocol is written—and what it looks like when patients and caregivers tell you a trial was designed with them in mind.