OR WAIT null SECS
© 2023 MJH Life Sciences™ and Applied Clinical Trials Online. All rights reserved.
COVID spotlights the troubling disparity in clinical research representation. How can we remove these barriers?
The pandemic has brought to light many economic and social disparities in the US—and the inequality in clinical research is one of the most troubling over the long term. As Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “of all forms of inequality, injustice in healthcare is the most shocking and inhuman.” The time is now for the clinical research industry to embrace and invest in innovative strategies that ensure equal representation and diversity of clinical trial participants.
“Minority populations were three times more likely to experience complications from COVID-19 but were not equitably represented in clinical trials for the vaccine,” says Greater Gift board member Harsha Rajasimha, PhD, CEO and Founder, Jeeva Informatics Solutions, Inc. “This challenge presents itself across varying disease states. We must build trust in minority communities to ensure that we are all equitably represented in research.”
Historically, social determinants of health have certainly played a part, as has the ingrained mistrust of the healthcare systems. Wariness of healthcare and clinical research is well-founded, and stems from historical events that adversely impacted racial and ethnic minorities, such as the unethical Tuskegee experiments.
According to a recent article in the Harvard Business Review: “Most clinical trials are not representative of the general population or of those with a particular disease. Clinical trials primarily enroll white, male patients, with consistent underrepresentation of women, the elderly, and people of color—especially Black and Hispanic patients. While people of color make up about 39% of the US population, these groups represent from 2% to 16% of patients in trials.” Leaders in clinical research know this data, and no doubt are disappointed, but continue to look for a “silver bullet” to solve the problem.
Greater Gift believes that while the clinical research industry has long recognized the challenge of enrolling minority volunteers, they have been slow to invest in innovation and solutions. Greater Gift believes that leaders in the nonprofit sector are uniquely positioned to build relationships and trust with minority communities before enrollment strategies are ever begun to help boost the engagement of underrepresented populations. Minority communities can, hence, better understand the clinical research process, the protections that are in place, and most importantly, why their involvement is an equity issue. Importantly, this work must be done long before an expectation of clinical trial participation can be expected.
FDA has taking on this issue with a new draft guidance: “Diversity Plans to Improve Enrollment of Participants from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations in Clinical Trials Guidance for Industry.” The agency believes the lack of representation of these populations in clinical research reflects, in part, a broader issue regarding differential access to healthcare, including access to and awareness of centers that conduct clinical research programs for new therapies.
Greater Gift is grateful for FDA’s leadership as a part of ensuring equity in clinical research. In addition, Greater Gift encourages the agency to consider the following action items that can help remove barriers to increased minority involvement in research:
Perla Nunes, Director of Outreach, Greater Gift