|Articles|January 21, 2016

EMA Agrees to Autism Biomarkers

The EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP) is combining genetic testing, neuroimaging, cognitive testing and clinical assessments to identify biological risk markers associated with subtypes of autism.

European Autism Interventions – A Multicenter Study for Developing New Medications (EU-AIMS) – the largest multi-center study of potential autism medicines – announced it has forged an agreement with the European Medicines Agency on procedures for selecting study participants and assessing the effectives of new treatments.

The EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP) is combining genetic testing, neuroimaging, cognitive testing and clinical assessments to identify biological risk markers associated with subtypes of autism with the goal of providing researchers with the ability to identify which subtypes best respond to different treatments.

The regulatory agency also agreed on the importance of further study of LEAP’s proposed biomarkers for autism. These include the results of brain-imaging tests that can track brain activity and connectivity, eye-tracking studies that measure attention to social cues and analysis of biological samples such as blood, saliva and urine. Biological samples are particularly important for identifying genetic risk factors that may contribute to some forms of autism.

Read the full release from Autism Speaks.

 

 

 


Related to this article

What It Actually Means to Embed the Patient Voice in Trial Design
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why genuine patient partnership begins before the protocol is written—and what it looks like when patients and caregivers tell you a trial was designed with them in mind.
Introducing The Human Side of Clinical Trials
This pilot episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials introduces a framework from Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., exploring why operational failures in clinical trials often trace back to gaps in human readiness rather than process design alone.