Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
|Articles|January 4, 2021

Oracle Health Sciences 2021 Industry Predictions

This industry won't be going back to “the old way.” Oracle GM and SVP, Henry McNamara, makes predictions for sponsors and CROs in 2021.

The shift to decentralized clinical trials and decentralized remote patient monitoring is not going away

The lockdowns of the COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on clinical trials in 2020, leading to rapid adoption of telemedicine and decentralized trial methods. This will continue in 2021—the industry is not going back to “the old way.” Therefore, sponsors and CROs need to set themselves up to operate successfully in this new model.

The rise in mHealth Data will demand changes to the current eClinical environment

Companies will increasingly turn to mHealth devices to gather data from patients remotely. This increased volume and variety of data coming from these devices will require unified technology platforms capable of collecting, managing, and analyzing it.

Automation will be used to ease the burden on study teams

The pace at which study teams have been working through COVID-19 trials is not sustainable. Despite interest in maintaining this “pandemic speed” of trials, staff simply cannot continue working 20-hour days, seven days a week, technology to streamline repetitive processes, automate trial design, and otherwise reduces the routine workload on professionals.

AI becomes mainstream

Artificial Intelligence (AI) pilot projects among sponsors and CROs in safety case intake and site selection have proven that AI is more effective and accurate than humans in these scenarios. These early successes mean that we’ll soon see AI go mainstream, with great expansion into these applications, as well as many more. As more companies lean into decentralized trials, and as the pace of trials and the amount of data that needs to be analyzed continues to increase, AI will emerge as the only way to process this data efficiently.

Regulators won’t stand in the way of decentralized trials

Regulatory guidance around decentralized clinical trials is widely seen as unclear. Moving forward, as situations require and technology enables a continued shift to decentralized trial methods, regulators will respond and accommodate the adoption of these methods

Henry McNamara is the GM and SVP of Oracle Health Sciences


Related to this article

© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.