Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
Commentary|Articles|April 11, 2025

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-04-01-2025
  • Volume 34
  • Issue 2

What’s Next for DEI?

Amid new government directives around diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in the US, our April issue explores the pivots and adjustments pharma and healthcare interests are making to maintain the progress of such efforts in advancing clinical research.

The conversation around diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in clinical research continues to get louder. Thanks in part to actions taken by the FDA in recent years, efforts to boost inclusivity have only increased. However, this year has brought new challenges to continuing momentum with diversity initiatives. The return of the Trump administration has brought with it executive orders banning DEI programs in the US federal government. Stakeholders in clinical research are wondering how this will affect the life sciences industry and how they can continue to bring inclusive and equitable research to patients. Applied Clinical Trials' annual issue on DEI explores this changing dynamic.

Our trio of feature articles in this edition begins with an all-encompassing piece on the current climate around diversity in clinical research. With new challenges, such as the aforementioned political and legislative maneuvering, the article dives into ways key stakeholders in the space can navigate and adapt to the changes in their efforts to enhance the accessibility and inclusivity of clinical trials.

Following the cover feature is a piece highlighting a use case on the adoption of eSource technology across six oncology research centers. Cancer trials are increasingly incorporating more sources of data, raising the burden on stakeholders, including sponsors and patients. With the help of capabilities, such as EHR-to-EDC tools, sponsors can take advantage of real-time data availability, streamlining workflows and bringing critical drugs to patients faster.

Rounding out our feature slate is an article spotlighting clinical trial liaisons (CTLs) and the strategic benefits these individuals can provide. Modeled after the implementation of medical science liaisons, CTLs can offer several advantages throughout a study, including more effective site identification, improved protocol development, and the facilitation of patient recruitment based on local standards.

Also in this issue, we are happy to share a snippet of our coverage from this year’s SCOPE (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) conference. Our team of Andy Studna, senior editor, and Don Tracy, associate editor, was onsite covering breakout sessions and interviewing industry leaders. As always, full coverage can be found online at appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/latest-conference.

Thank you for reading.

Mike Hennessy Jr is president and CEO of MJH Life Sciences®

Related to this article

Closing the Community Access Gap: Q&A with Kent Thoelke, Paradigm Health
In this Q&A, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, discusses why participation gaps in community and rural settings come down to both patient cost barriers and site infrastructure, how legacy workflows weigh on community clinics, and what policy and technology changes it would take to make clinical research a real care option for more patients.
© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.