Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
News|Articles|September 1, 2013

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-09-01-2013
  • Volume 22
  • Issue 9

Investigator Non-Compliance and Fraud

Tufts CSDD

The number of complaints filed with the FDA for investigator non-compliance and fraud rose rapidly in the late 1990s due in part to increased reporting from study monitors, ethical review boards and research sponsors and due to improvements in convenience and anonymity in filing complaints. During the past decade, however, the total number of complaints filed as a percentage of active investigational new drugs (INDs) has been falling from a peak of 6.6% in 2003 to 4.1% in 2011. At this time, the FDA receives an average of 257 complaints for PI non-compliance and fraud each year with protocol violations, data falsification and poor drug accountability the top reasons cited.

Figure 1. The rate of complaints for investigator non-compliance and fraud is falling.

—Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, https://csdd.tufts.edu.

Articles in this issue


Related to this article

What Needs to Happen Beyond the Clinical Trial Modernization Act
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, calls for safe harbor protections, CMS reimbursement safeguards, and funding mechanisms modeled on EHR meaningful use to help community and rural institutions participate in research on par with academic centers.
Building AI Assistants Clinical Trial Teams Can Trust: Q&A with E.K. Koh, Suvoda
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.