Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
|Articles|June 1, 2016

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-06-01-2016
  • Volume 25
  • Issue 6

Paperless Processes on the Way Out?

Survey reveals mixed adoption of paperless data collection in clinical trials, pointing to the need for greater alignment of new eClinical technologies and study conduct.

In January 2014, the FDA presented a webinar “Promoting eSource Data Capture,” to explain its Final Guidance on Electronic Source Data in Clinical Investigations. In a slide, the FDA said the worst case for source data capture is “transcription of data from paper or electronic sources to the eCRF (electronic case report form).” The reason being that there was no intervening paper step needed, less confusion on what is source and the decreased likelihood of data errors.

In April of this year, we conducted a survey with SCORR Marketing to evaluate the paperless trial. In this survey, of 143 respondents, 25% said 0%-10% of their data collection in clinical trials was paperless. The next highest was 22%, who said that greater than 75% of their trials were paperless. And 15% said between 51% and 75% were paperless. So the majority fall in the middle of paperless processes, leaving room for greater adoption in the coming years.

In fact, the majority of respondents-27%-said that in the next three years, 75% to 99% of the processes for clinical trials would be paperless. With the plethora of new technologies surrounding data aggregation, mining, and analytics in all critical areas of study conduct, we can only see that our respondents are correct in their view.

For more information, download SCORR’s free report here.


Related to this article

Closing the Community Access Gap: Q&A with Kent Thoelke, Paradigm Health
In this Q&A, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, discusses why participation gaps in community and rural settings come down to both patient cost barriers and site infrastructure, how legacy workflows weigh on community clinics, and what policy and technology changes it would take to make clinical research a real care option for more patients.
© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.