Refutable Rates
Applied Clinical Trials
Perhaps few issues elicit more interest in clinical trial agreements (clinical grants) than the overhead portion of the contract. Clinical trial agreements typically have three parts: procedures, nonprocedures, and overhead.
Perhaps few issues elicit more interest in clinical trial agreements (clinical grants) than the overhead portion of the contract. Clinical trial agreements typically have three parts: procedures, nonprocedures, and overhead.
Procedures are those medical activities directly related to the protocol that may range from a blood draw to something far more complex. Nonprocedures include an equally broad range of activities, such as study coordinator time, facility charges, patient reimbursement, and meals.
Overheads are indirect institutional costs allocated to individual departments and their programs. These indirect costs can include such illustrative items as costs of the institution's general management, building maintenance, general administration, and in some cases, general marketing efforts.
Here we report U.S. overhead rates. Few pharmaceutical companies are willing to pay overhead costs to office-based investigators. However, most clinical trial agreements with institutions include an overhead figure.
Clinical grant data in GrantPlan from companies conducting 76% of all clinical studies demonstrate that, in general, overheads at academic medical centers are slightly higher than at other institutions.
Instiutions vs Actual Agreements in U.S.-Based Overhead Figures
Particularly noteworthy though is the significant difference between the overhead rate reported by the institution, frequently used as the starting point in negotiations, and the actual amount accepted in the contract by the institution.—TTC (For more information, please contact help@ttc-llc.com.)
FDA Approves Nipocalimab for the Treatment of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
April 30th 2025Approval is based on results from the pivotal Vivacity-MG3 trial in which IMAAVY (nipocalimab-aahu) demonstrated superior disease control throughout 24 weeks when compared to placebo plus standard of care.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Behind the Buzz: Why Clinical Research Leaders Flock to SCOPE Summit
February 7th 2025In this episode, we meet with Micah Lieberman, Executive Conference Director for SCOPE Summit (Summit for Clinical Ops Executives) at Cambridge Innovation Institute. We will dive deep into the critical role of collaboration within the clinical research ecosystem. How do we bring together diverse stakeholders—sponsors, CROs, clinical trial tech innovators, suppliers, patients, sites, advocacy organizations, investors, and non-profits—to share best practices in trial design, program planning, innovation, and clinical operations? We’ll explore why it’s vital for thought leaders to step beyond their own organizations and learn from others, exchanging ideas that drive advancements in clinical research. Additionally, we’ll discuss the pivotal role of scientific conferences like SCOPE Summit in fostering these essential connections and collaborations, helping shape the future of clinical trials. Join us as we uncover how collective wisdom and cross-industry partnerships are transforming the landscape of clinical research.
