News|Articles|May 1, 2010

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-05-01-2010
  • Volume 0
  • Issue 0

Me-Too's Struggle

Contrary to common belief, the development of follow-on drugs, often referred to as me-too drugs, does not begin after a first new drug in a therapeutic category receives market approval. The reality is that sponsors are engaged in drug development races that are intensely competitive where the first drug candidate to receive marketing approval belongs to the sponsor that got to the finish line with a satisfactory submission the fastest.

Contrary to common belief, the development of follow-on drugs, often referred to as me-too drugs, does not begin after a first new drug in a therapeutic category receives market approval. The reality is that sponsors are engaged in drug development races that are intensely competitive where the first drug candidate to receive marketing approval belongs to the sponsor that got to the finish line with a satisfactory submission the fastest.

Follow-on Drug Competition Intensifying

A new study by Tufts CSDD shows that market exclusivity periods for first-in-class drugs have fallen dramatically from nine years on average in the 1960s, to 2.3 years in the 2000s. Moreover, competition between follow-on drugs has heated up as the average time between first and second follow-on drugs has been compressed from an average of 13.5 years in the 1960s to slightly more than one year on average in the 2000s. As each new drug enters a therapeutic category, other drugs in that category typically lose market share. As such, intense competition threatens to erode and dampen sponsors' return on development investment.—Tufts Center for Drug Development, http://csdd.tufts.edu

Articles in this issue

over 16 years ago

Research Integrity Gets Boost

over 16 years ago

EDC & EHR Integration

over 16 years ago

Clinical Trials for Kids

over 16 years ago

act supplement cover

over 16 years ago

A Patient Universe

over 16 years ago

Conversations With Study Volunteers

over 16 years ago

Business and News Update May 2010

Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.