In an interview with ACT senior editor Andy Studna at SCOPE Summit, Pamela Tenaerts, chief scientific officer, Medable, discusses the need for more data around the implementation of clinical technology.
ACT: What are some barriers that stakeholders struggle to overcome when they want to implement more DCT approaches?
Tenaerts: What I think, and why I think it's important to support groups and consortia that collect data is that we've had a lot of hype and hopes for using technology and modern clinical trial elements, but we don't have a lot of evidence of what it actually does, so this effort really gets us at that evidence where we start learning, how does it change protocol, performance, what should we use, where? Because as we get more data, we also know really well what the trials are that we're studying those elements, so we'll know what it's cardiology, in oncology, exactly what modules they use and exactly what outcomes they have so that when we start getting more data, I think people will know that it can get them what they want, and that I think there's hesitancy around is it really going to get me what I want? I think this is one of the elements. The other barriers that people might have had was regulatory acceptance, but I think in the last couple of years, we've gotten a lot of guidances indicating that, yes, the regulators are in favor of this, if you do it right. I think we've also gotten to better workflows and better products over time.
ACT: What are some other projects or initiatives the PACT Consortium is working on that excite you most?
Tenaerts: What we've learned with PACT is that we had an initial set of metrics that we were calculating, and what we're finding is now that we're getting evidence of some of those elements, people are drilling down on those elements, so there's another layer of metrics that we will be exploring. I think that's the interesting part, is this is really like an onion, like in the first year, we started asking about the more obvious data elements of protocol performance and reaching the right populations and now we're getting deeper and deeper and it's really going to be fascinating to see what we're going to learn about what using technology in clinical trials does for us, just as much as how we use technology in the real world, right?
Putting Collective Insights Into Action to Advance Cancer Care: Key Examples From ASCO 2025
June 27th 2025At ASCO 2025, clinical operations leaders gained critical insights into how AI tools, bispecific antibodies, and evolving treatment paradigms are reshaping trial design, endpoint selection, and patient stratification.
Improving Relationships and Diversifying the Site Selection Process
April 17th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, Liz Beatty, co-founder and chief strategy officer, Inato, discusses a number of topics around site engagement including community-based sites, the role of technology in improving site/sponsor relationships, how increased operational costs are impacting the industry, and more.
Beyond the Molecule: How Human-Centered Design Unlocks AI's Promise in Pharma
June 23rd 2025How human-centered AI that is focused on customer, user, and employee experience can drive real transformation in clinical trials and beyond by aligning intelligent technologies with the people who use them.
2025 DIA Annual Meeting: Why AI and Automation Are Set to Become the New Normal in Clinical Research
June 20th 2025Peter Ronco, CEO, Emmes, shares his long-term vision for artificial intelligence in clinical research, from making automation routine to improving drug discovery, transforming regulatory oversight, reducing animal testing, and promoting ethical, equitable data use worldwide.