Commentary|Videos|July 29, 2025

Growing Excitement Around Biomarkers in Clinical Trials

In this video interview, Michael Miller, chief operating officer at Quanterix, discusses how the use of biomarkers is expanding beyond exploratory endpoints to inform efficacy and patient selection, driving improved outcomes and greater efficiency in clinical research.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Michael Miller, chief operating officer, Quanterix, discussed how the clinical research industry is increasingly integrating biomarkers. Biomarkers are particularly beneficial in neurology, where advancements in imaging and blood tests have improved trial outcomes, and in oncology, where multiomic approaches and protein tissue imaging aid in matching therapies to mutations. Synopsis professionals should focus on the biomarker's purpose, technical requirements, and regulatory compliance. Platform trials and biomarkers are also driving accelerated drug approvals. These advancements are crucial for biopharma companies navigating the shift between private and government-funded research.

ACT: Where does the clinical research industry currently stand with biomarker integration? Is it becoming more popular, is there hesitancy around it, excitement, etc.?

Miller: I think there is a lot of excitement about biomarkers in clinical trials right now, and a lot of that stems with some of the new uses. Currently, a lot of trials do include biomarkers. Today, many of them can be used for exploratory purposes or exploratory endpoints, but the real action, or the real excitement is around biomarkers starting to be used to understand the efficacy of the drug or to help understand selecting the right patients to be enrolled in a trial for a particular drug. Why is there excitement? Excitement is because that can make the clinical trial outcomes more successful and make the clinical trials more efficient, in terms of you're getting the right patients on the right drug, seeing better efficacy in those patients.


Related to this article

What It Actually Means to Embed the Patient Voice in Trial Design
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why genuine patient partnership begins before the protocol is written—and what it looks like when patients and caregivers tell you a trial was designed with them in mind.
Introducing The Human Side of Clinical Trials
This pilot episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials introduces a framework from Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., exploring why operational failures in clinical trials often trace back to gaps in human readiness rather than process design alone.
© C Davids/peopleimages.com - © C Davids/peopleimages.com - stock.adobe.com
The clinical research industry talks about patient-centeredness constantly but embeds it too late, too narrowly, and without clear ownership, and the cost shows up in enrollment failures, protocol deviations, and outcomes that don't reflect what patients actually care about.