Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|August 1, 2025

Adapting to a Changing Research Funding Landscape

In this video interview, Michael Miller, chief operating officer at Quanterix, discusses how biopharma companies—especially smaller biotechs—can leverage platform trials and biomarker-driven accelerated approvals to remain efficient and competitive amid shifting public-private funding dynamics.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Michael Miller, chief operating officer, Quanterix, discussed how the clinical research industry is increasingly integrating biomarkers. Biomarkers are particularly beneficial in neurology, where advancements in imaging and blood tests have improved trial outcomes, and in oncology, where multiomic approaches and protein tissue imaging aid in matching therapies to mutations. Synopsis professionals should focus on the biomarker's purpose, technical requirements, and regulatory compliance. Platform trials and biomarkers are also driving accelerated drug approvals. These advancements are crucial for biopharma companies navigating the shift between private and government-funded research.

ACT: With a shift in balance occurring between private and government-funded clinical research, what are some opportunities for biopharma companies moving forward as they navigate this new, challenging landscape?

Miller: I can think of a couple areas. One is, in terms of, let's say biotechs or smaller companies, probably not so much large pharma, but participating in platform trials as a way of having a more efficient clinical trial approach. A platform trial is where a particular institution or different institutions will pull money together to be able to recruit patients within a particular disease area. Sometimes it's rare diseases because they're less available and harder to recruit, and then multiple drug companies can come and access that population and do subsets of that population, give them drugs, track their outputs, and the infrastructure is put together by the platform so each company doesn't have to do that lift. That's one example I can think of that can help people be more efficient given the times, and do things like that.

The other relates back to one of the main themes of this discussion, which is biomarkers. In the example I'll cite here is that biomarkers have allowed people to get accelerated approval for drugs that have a breakthrough designation. One example in the neurology area was a blood test for neurofilament light that was used to gain accelerated approval for an ALS drug, so that's an example. That's a technology that Quanterix was involved in, neurofilament light, making that commercializing that assay, but that's a huge gain to where now you have a rare disease, it's very difficult to track clinical outcomes, and here's a biomarker that can show efficacy by giving you a signal of lower levels of neurodegeneration that then can speed going to getting regulatory approval. Again, accelerated regulatory approval, nonetheless, it allows them to get them to market faster and advance the drug.


Related to this article

Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Needs to Happen Beyond the Clinical Trial Modernization Act
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, calls for safe harbor protections, CMS reimbursement safeguards, and funding mechanisms modeled on EHR meaningful use to help community and rural institutions participate in research on par with academic centers.
Building AI Assistants Clinical Trial Teams Can Trust: Q&A with E.K. Koh, Suvoda
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.