Three Key Takeaways from SCOPE
The trends that seem to be garnering the most discussion today among clinical trial management and operations professionals.
Having just attended the SCOPE Summit last month, I wanted to provide some general insights uncovered from
the event. These gatherings are still going strong and are a great place to network and get first-hand knowledge into what your peers are experiencing or initiating in their companies. There wasn’t a session that I didn’t walk away from with a new idea. But SCOPE has a lot of sessions daily to choose from, so it can be a challenge trying to decide which to go to. Here’s some highlights.
Risk-based monitoring
RBM is the gift that keeps on giving. While some may lament that RBM has never really taken off, or morphed into new-world risked-based quality management, a great goal in and of itself, don’t be fooled. RBM is going places, if based on the number of attendees at these sessions at SCOPE. The level of sharing of implementations, lessons learned, challenges acknowledged, and overall idea exchange and engagement was very high, and the excitement around others’ work was real. Hopefully, we will be able to track down some speakers for our May issue on change management in RBM to discuss their efforts.
Decentralized trials
Decentralized clinical trials, or because you need another acronym in our industry, DCTs, are on everyone’s minds. From the lessons learned from remote trials just a few years ago, DCTs are mainstream and gaining ground because of their efficiency and patient-friendly ways. eCOA, ePRO, sensors, wearables, telemedicine, mobile nurses, eConsent-you name it. If it has a need for a distant relationship for trial participation, it will be baked into a DCT. DCTs will certainly be a part of our conversation in June when we tackle patient-centric trial design.
Outsourcing for small biopharma
The percentage of FDA approvals obtained by big pharma in 2018 was 26%, compared to 60% that went to firms that had never before re-ceived an approval. What this means is that the smaller or emerging biopharma needs help with its clinical trials pipeline, and, largely, they are not happy with CROs.
This is
I hope that this is an area that can start to get it together. Small biopharma operates on very small margins, and putting their whole hopes and dreams into a CRO that doesn’t work for them is a sad thing for medicine and discovery. We will be focusing on that issue more closely in September.
There’s always a lot to talk about in clinical trials, so keep reading us in print or online and we will keep you up to date.
Lisa Henderson is Editor-in-Chief of Applied Clinical Trials. She can be reached at
Articles in this issue
Newsletter
Stay current in clinical research with Applied Clinical Trials, providing expert insights, regulatory updates, and practical strategies for successful clinical trial design and execution.
Related Articles
- Generative AI Transforms Clinical Study Report Development
September 16th 2025
- Operational Strategies That Strengthened the NIMBLE Trial Design
September 16th 2025