Women Prefer HIV Trials They Discover Through Peers
Women are often underrepresented in HIV clinical trials, but they appear to prefer finding out about trials by means of peer-to-peer communication, according to new analysis.
Women are often underrepresented in HIV clinical trials, making it difficult to decipher the relevance of findings and whether they are applicable to all, but they appear to prefer finding out about trials by means of peer-to-peer communication, according to new analysis.
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS) researchers Sara Looby, PhD, and Markella Zanni, MD, uncovered women’s preferred methods for learning about a clinical study were peer-to-peer communication (52% of those questioned), provider communication (46%), and video-based communication (39%). Women were most likely to take part to gain information (63%) and to help others (47%).
Coinciding with National Women and Girls HIV/AIDS Awareness Day in the U.S., which was March 10, they have published their data in the Taylor & Francis journal HIV Clinical Trials. The article shows how an evidence-based campaign, Follow YOUR Heart, is empowering older women with HIV to participate in a large-scale clinical trial, called REPRIEVE, which is aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease.
“Feedback from our community sample of women offered valuable perspectives on methods to help educate and engage women with HIV on research participation, making our Follow YOUR Heart campaign truly patient-centered,” the authors noted.
Looby is assistant professor of Medicine at HMS, a principal investigator in the Program of Nutritional Metabolism, and a nurse scientist at the Yvonne L. Munn Center for Nursing Research at MGH. Her research is focused on cardiometabolic and bone health among individuals aging with HIV, particularly women. She also has conducted studies related to menopause symptoms, and cardiovascular disease in relation to reproductive aging.
Zanni is a physician in the MGH Neuroendocrine Clinical Center, a faculty member in the Neuroendocrine Unit at MGH, and an assistant professor of medicine at HMS. She is a clinical researcher in the MGH Program in Nutritional Metabolism and she studies metabolic and cardiovascular complications of inflammation.
Philip Ward is the European Editor for Applied Clinical Trials
FDA Grants Priority Review to Merck’s sBLA for Winrevair After Early Success in ZENITH PAH Trial
July 2nd 2025Merck’s bid to update Winrevair’s label advances with FDA priority review, backed by Phase III ZENITH data showing a 76% reduction in major morbidity and mortality events in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Unifying Industry to Better Understand GCP Guidance
May 7th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, David Nickerson, head of clinical quality management at EMD Serono; and Arlene Lee, director of product management, data quality & risk management solutions at Medidata, discuss the newest ICH E6(R3) GCP guidelines as well as how TransCelerate and ACRO have partnered to help stakeholders better acclimate to these guidelines.
Phase III PROMINENT Trial Initiated to Evaluate Felzartamab for Primary Membranous Nephropathy
June 30th 2025The global Phase III PROMINENT trial has begun dosing patients to evaluate felzartamab in treating primary membranous nephropathy, a serious autoimmune kidney disorder with no FDA-approved therapies.
Putting Collective Insights Into Action to Advance Cancer Care: Key Examples From ASCO 2025
June 27th 2025At ASCO 2025, clinical operations leaders gained critical insights into how AI tools, bispecific antibodies, and evolving treatment paradigms are reshaping trial design, endpoint selection, and patient stratification.
