Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
|Articles|January 1, 2013

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-01-01-2013
  • Volume 22
  • Issue 1

Revisiting Clinical Grant Expenditures

Author(s)TTC

TTC

As site costs continue to increase in the more traditional areas for clinical research, a growing number of CRO's and sponsors are using sites in areas such as Latin America, Asia, and Eastern Europe according to GrantPlan. The demand for less expensive markets have increased as sponsors and CRO's reach toward less expensive regions in which to conduct clinical trials. Lower costs will never be the decisive consideration in selecting a site, however, substantial cost differences are becoming more important in the decision making process.

TTC, now a part of IMS, continues to provide annual current global data on the relative costs of clinical grants around the world using the GrantPlan database. The aggregate GrantPlan subscribers conduct nearly 80% of all commercial clinical trials around the world, with each sponsor company and CRO contributing the current costs of each clinical trial.

Mean cost per visit in Phase II-III clinical trials.

This year, the data shows the United States and the United Kingdom continues to be the most expensive countries for clinical grants. With low single digit growth in the established geographies, grant costs seem to have stabilized. Despite the increased demand, the newer geographies have experienced a slight decrease in the costs per visit of approximately 6% in Asia and a minimal increase in Latin America.

—TTC (for more information, please contact help@ttc-llc.com)

Articles in this issue

almost 14 years ago

Act cover

almost 14 years ago

Free-to-Use eLearning Modules

almost 14 years ago

Leading Clinical Projects

almost 14 years ago

Business and News Update January 2013

almost 14 years ago

Research Integrity

Related to this article

© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.